Unattended/Unattended to?
How does residential electricity work?
Products and sum of cubes in Fibonacci
Personal Teleportation as a Weapon
Displaying the order of the columns of a table
What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Print name if parameter passed to function
How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus?
How to combine multiple text files of different lengths and multiple columns by a column
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
What is the oldest known work of fiction?
Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
Hide Select Output from T-SQL
Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?
Lay out the Carpet
Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
Unattended/Unattended to?
I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.
1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.
3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.
phrasal-verbs
add a comment |
I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.
1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.
3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.
phrasal-verbs
1
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.
1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.
3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.
phrasal-verbs
I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.
1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.
3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.
phrasal-verbs
phrasal-verbs
asked 7 hours ago
Talha ÖzdenTalha Özden
33517
33517
1
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
1
1
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.
Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.
The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.
add a comment |
If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:
- Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:
Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
(Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)
Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
spills unattended to.
(Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)
- Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):
Please do not leave your luggage unattended
(Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)
The sourse with examples of the usage.
*In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.
add a comment |
Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to".
Both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
"Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.
Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.
New contributor
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202534%2funattended-unattended-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.
Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.
The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.
add a comment |
Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.
Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.
The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.
add a comment |
Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.
Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.
The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.
Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.
Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.
The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
SamBCSamBC
14.8k1958
14.8k1958
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
add a comment |
If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
add a comment |
If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.
If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.
answered 7 hours ago
AcccumulationAcccumulation
1,67317
1,67317
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
add a comment |
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"
– Talha Özden
6 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.
– Mixolydian
5 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
@Mixolydian Thank you :)
– Talha Özden
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:
- Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:
Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
(Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)
Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
spills unattended to.
(Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)
- Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):
Please do not leave your luggage unattended
(Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)
The sourse with examples of the usage.
*In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.
add a comment |
The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:
- Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:
Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
(Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)
Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
spills unattended to.
(Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)
- Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):
Please do not leave your luggage unattended
(Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)
The sourse with examples of the usage.
*In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.
add a comment |
The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:
- Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:
Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
(Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)
Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
spills unattended to.
(Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)
- Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):
Please do not leave your luggage unattended
(Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)
The sourse with examples of the usage.
*In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.
The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:
- Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:
Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?
(Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)
Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
spills unattended to.
(Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)
- Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):
Please do not leave your luggage unattended
(Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)
The sourse with examples of the usage.
*In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.
answered 3 hours ago
RompeyRompey
6,58522365
6,58522365
add a comment |
add a comment |
Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to".
Both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
"Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.
Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.
New contributor
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to".
Both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
"Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.
Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.
New contributor
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to".
Both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
"Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.
Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.
New contributor
Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to".
Both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
"Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.
Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
David PawleyDavid Pawley
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.
– Talha Özden
2 hours ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
@talha They ought to.
– David Pawley
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202534%2funattended-unattended-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago
So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".
– Talha Özden
7 hours ago
if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.
– Colin Fine
7 hours ago