Bash method for viewing beginning and end of fileCommand to display first few and last few lines of a fileRace Condition for Shell Blocks in Bash?Add character to beginning and end of columnHow to transform two delimited ASCII filesusing awk to create a LaTex table from my data in a text fileAppend columns in a text file to after the final rowRemove spaces and headers from a dumped database tableCount the maximum character length for all the data fields in a simplified csv file and output to txtWriting a program for editing .txt data - Python or Unix?Merging two Unix filesegrep regular expression - same word in the beginning and endhow to evaluate number between a range of numbers using different variables in bash

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

What would be the benefits of having both a state and local currencies?

How does residential electricity work?

How to verify if g is a generator for p?

Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?

What is difference between behavior and behaviour

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

How can I use the arrow sign in my bash prompt?

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

when is out of tune ok?

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

HashMap containsKey() returns false although hashCode() and equals() are true

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

How do I define a right arrow with bar in LaTeX?

Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?

What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?

What to do with wrong results in talks?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

Coordinate position not precise

Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file



Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file


Command to display first few and last few lines of a fileRace Condition for Shell Blocks in Bash?Add character to beginning and end of columnHow to transform two delimited ASCII filesusing awk to create a LaTex table from my data in a text fileAppend columns in a text file to after the final rowRemove spaces and headers from a dumped database tableCount the maximum character length for all the data fields in a simplified csv file and output to txtWriting a program for editing .txt data - Python or Unix?Merging two Unix filesegrep regular expression - same word in the beginning and endhow to evaluate number between a range of numbers using different variables in bash













4















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago
















4















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago














4












4








4








On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?







bash text-processing






share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Rui F Ribeiro

41.7k1483142




41.7k1483142






New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









MadisonCooperMadisonCooper

233




233




New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago


















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago

















Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
4 hours ago






Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
4 hours ago





1




1





Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
4 hours ago






Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
4 hours ago





1




1





I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
4 hours ago






I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
4 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago






  • 2





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago







  • 1





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago







  • 1





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago


















1














awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer

























  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    4 hours ago



















0














You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( showqueue )





share|improve this answer










New contributor




Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    5 hours ago











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago


















0














Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago






    • 2





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      4 hours ago















    8














    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago






    • 2





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      4 hours ago













    8












    8








    8







    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer













    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    Timothy PulliamTimothy Pulliam

    1,335924




    1,335924







    • 3





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago






    • 2





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      4 hours ago












    • 3





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago






    • 2





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      5 hours ago







    • 1





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      4 hours ago







    3




    3





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago













    Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago





    Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago




    2




    2





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago






    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago





    1




    1





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago






    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    5 hours ago





    1




    1





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    4 hours ago













    1














    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
    END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer

























    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      4 hours ago
















    1














    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
    END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer

























    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      4 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
    END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer















    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
    END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    ilkkachuilkkachu

    62.7k10103180




    62.7k10103180












    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      4 hours ago


















    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      4 hours ago

















    If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago





    If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago













    @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    4 hours ago






    @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    4 hours ago












    0














    You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



    awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( showqueue )





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • yes let me update

      – Abdurrahim
      5 hours ago











    • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago















    0














    You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



    awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( showqueue )





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • yes let me update

      – Abdurrahim
      5 hours ago











    • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago













    0












    0








    0







    You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



    awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( showqueue )





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



    awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( showqueue )






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago





















    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 5 hours ago









    AbdurrahimAbdurrahim

    1012




    1012




    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    • 1





      This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • yes let me update

      – Abdurrahim
      5 hours ago











    • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago












    • 1





      This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

      – Kusalananda
      5 hours ago











    • yes let me update

      – Abdurrahim
      5 hours ago











    • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

      – mosvy
      4 hours ago







    1




    1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    5 hours ago













    yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    5 hours ago





    yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    5 hours ago













    This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago





    This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    4 hours ago











    0














    Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



    showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


    This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



      showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


      This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



        showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


        This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






        share|improve this answer















        Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



        showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


        This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 5 hours ago









        KusalanandaKusalananda

        138k17258426




        138k17258426




















            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?How is it wrong to believe that a self exists, or that it doesn't?Can you criticise or improve Ven. Bodhi's description of MahayanaWas the doctrine of 'Anatta', accepted as doctrine by modern Buddhism, actually taught by the Buddha?Relationship between Buddhism, Hinduism and Yoga?Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/AtmaIs there a distinction between “ego identity” and “craving/hating”?Are there many differences between Taoism and Buddhism?Loss of “faith” in buddhismSimilarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?Are there studies about the difference between meditating in the morning versus in the evening?Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?Are there any prohibitions on participating in other religion's practices?Psychology of 'flow'

            Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverShulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?Are there practices where Sepharadim do not hold by Shulchan Aruch?5th part of the shulchan aruch

            fallocate: fallocate failed: Text file busy in Ubuntu 17.04? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)defragmenting and increasing performance of old lubuntu system with swap partitionIssue with increasing the root partition from the swapthis /usr/bin/dpkg returned error || ubuntu-16.04, 64bitDefault 17.04 swap file locationHow to Resize Ubuntu 17.04 Zesty Swap file size?Ubuntu freezes from online formsMy Laptop is not starting after upgrade ubuntu 16.04 (Kernel 4.8.0-38 to 04.10.0-36)hcp: ERROR: FALLOCATE FAILED!Not sure my swap is being usedWine 3.0 asking for more virtual free swap