Ttgjyuk

Converting from "matrix" data into "coordinate" data

I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Do black holes violate the conservation of mass?

Playing a 7-string guitar song on a 6-string guitar

Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Create chunks from an array

I can't die. Who am I?

Locked Away- What am I?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?

Writing text next to a table

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Numerical value of Determinant far from what it is supposed to be

How to copy the rest of lines of a file to another file

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

Is there a logarithm base for which the logarithm becomes an identity function?

Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?

Factor Rings over Finite Fields

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

What does “声が出る” mean?Grammatical meaning of に-particle in へいわにCan't understand why “に” is used in “蚊に刺された” or what's the sense of this sentenceWhat is the function of particle に in 「Aチームに[勝つ]【かつ】チームがあるとしたら…」?Use of the particle を/に indicating target of an action - animate vs inanimate?Particle「も」in the sentence 「夏休みももう終わりだ」。Why is the を particle used twice hereこの文の「を」の使い方// usage of the particle をIndicating time in Japanese: に、は、or no particle?When can you use the particle さ?Using the particle と or the particle に with あう

3

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

add a comment | 

3

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

add a comment | 

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

edited 3 hours ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

asked 4 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

46219

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65931%2fwill-expression-retain-the-same-definition-if-particle-is-changed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

share

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

answered 4 hours ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

2,003720

3

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

3

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 4 hours ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299