Mount problem with 64gb microSDXCUnable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04Micro SD Card slot not working on Lenovo N22 Ubuntu 16.04Move Ubuntu server from 64gb SD to 16gb USBUSB stick shows up as two drives!df showing different disk sizes in 14.04 and 12.04?ASUS Q550LF and 64GB SDXC cardUbuntu full install on 64gb usb3.0 sandiskworking 14.04 ubuntu to error: no such device: grub rescue>USB Stick doesn't react after 'formatting'dual boot windows 10 and ubuntu 14.04 problem error no such device64GB SD card won't mountMount sdcard using mount() function of linux
If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?
The (Easy) Road to Code
Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?
How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?
Are these two graphs isomorphic? Why/Why not?
Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a book for me through an inter-library loan?
Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?
Does an unused member variable take up memory?
How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?
How do I raise a figure (placed with wrapfig) to be flush with the top of a paragraph?
Logistic regression BIC: what's the right N?
Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?
Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?
Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!
Which country has more?
Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire
Finding the minimum value of a function without using Calculus
Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?
Mount problem with 64gb microSDXC
Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04Micro SD Card slot not working on Lenovo N22 Ubuntu 16.04Move Ubuntu server from 64gb SD to 16gb USBUSB stick shows up as two drives!df showing different disk sizes in 14.04 and 12.04?ASUS Q550LF and 64GB SDXC cardUbuntu full install on 64gb usb3.0 sandiskworking 14.04 ubuntu to error: no such device: grub rescue>USB Stick doesn't react after 'formatting'dual boot windows 10 and ubuntu 14.04 problem error no such device64GB SD card won't mountMount sdcard using mount() function of linux
I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04
Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.
Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:
Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)
fdisk output:
Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
14.04 usb sd-card
|
show 2 more comments
I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04
Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.
Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:
Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)
fdisk output:
Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
14.04 usb sd-card
Can you show the output ofsudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?
– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
|
show 2 more comments
I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04
Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.
Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:
Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)
fdisk output:
Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
14.04 usb sd-card
I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04
Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.
Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:
Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)
fdisk output:
Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
14.04 usb sd-card
14.04 usb sd-card
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:25
Community♦
1
1
asked Dec 9 '14 at 22:22
Paul GregoirePaul Gregoire
418513
418513
Can you show the output ofsudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?
– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
|
show 2 more comments
Can you show the output ofsudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?
– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
Can you show the output of
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Can you show the output of
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?
Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.
add a comment |
This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
add a comment |
This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.
For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).
To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.
Product ID: 0x6200
Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
(gotta love that serial number)
-Greg
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f558594%2fmount-problem-with-64gb-microsdxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?
Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.
add a comment |
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?
Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.
add a comment |
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?
Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?
Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.
answered Dec 10 '14 at 2:55
Xen2050Xen2050
6,88622343
6,88622343
add a comment |
add a comment |
This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
add a comment |
This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
add a comment |
This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?
This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?
answered Dec 10 '14 at 0:26
Mark WilliamsMark Williams
2,335820
2,335820
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
add a comment |
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
add a comment |
This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.
For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).
To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.
Product ID: 0x6200
Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
(gotta love that serial number)
-Greg
add a comment |
This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.
For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).
To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.
Product ID: 0x6200
Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
(gotta love that serial number)
-Greg
add a comment |
This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.
For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).
To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.
Product ID: 0x6200
Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
(gotta love that serial number)
-Greg
This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.
For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).
To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.
Product ID: 0x6200
Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
(gotta love that serial number)
-Greg
edited 5 hours ago
answered Apr 2 '18 at 16:06
GregDGregD
1012
1012
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f558594%2fmount-problem-with-64gb-microsdxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you show the output of
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd
?– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45
Added fdisk output
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59
That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?
– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30
Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42
Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.
– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20