Mount problem with 64gb microSDXCUnable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04Micro SD Card slot not working on Lenovo N22 Ubuntu 16.04Move Ubuntu server from 64gb SD to 16gb USBUSB stick shows up as two drives!df showing different disk sizes in 14.04 and 12.04?ASUS Q550LF and 64GB SDXC cardUbuntu full install on 64gb usb3.0 sandiskworking 14.04 ubuntu to error: no such device: grub rescue>USB Stick doesn't react after 'formatting'dual boot windows 10 and ubuntu 14.04 problem error no such device64GB SD card won't mountMount sdcard using mount() function of linux

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

The (Easy) Road to Code

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?

Are these two graphs isomorphic? Why/Why not?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a book for me through an inter-library loan?

Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

How do I raise a figure (placed with wrapfig) to be flush with the top of a paragraph?

Logistic regression BIC: what's the right N?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Which country has more?

Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire

Finding the minimum value of a function without using Calculus

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?



Mount problem with 64gb microSDXC


Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04Micro SD Card slot not working on Lenovo N22 Ubuntu 16.04Move Ubuntu server from 64gb SD to 16gb USBUSB stick shows up as two drives!df showing different disk sizes in 14.04 and 12.04?ASUS Q550LF and 64GB SDXC cardUbuntu full install on 64gb usb3.0 sandiskworking 14.04 ubuntu to error: no such device: grub rescue>USB Stick doesn't react after 'formatting'dual boot windows 10 and ubuntu 14.04 problem error no such device64GB SD card won't mountMount sdcard using mount() function of linux













1















I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
enter image description here



So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04



Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.



Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:



Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)


fdisk output:




Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
























  • Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

    – Mark Williams
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:45











  • Added fdisk output

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:59











  • That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

    – Xen2050
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:30











  • Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:42











  • Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 1:20
















1















I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
enter image description here



So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04



Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.



Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:



Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)


fdisk output:




Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
























  • Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

    – Mark Williams
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:45











  • Added fdisk output

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:59











  • That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

    – Xen2050
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:30











  • Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:42











  • Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 1:20














1












1








1








I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
enter image description here



So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04



Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.



Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:



Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)


fdisk output:




Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
















I am using a Kingston MMC USB reader with a Samsung 64Gb microSDXC UHS-I card. The first time I inserted it, this dialog appeared:
enter image description here



So I searched around and found a similar q/a here; I performed the steps in the answer for the question: Unable to access 64gb volume - Ubuntu 14.04



Now the error dialog does not appear any longer, but the 64Gb card only mounts as 29Gb volume now.



Here is the output of lsusb if that helps:



Bus 003 Device 006: ID 090c:6000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) SD/SDHC Card Reader (SG365 / FlexiDrive XC+)


fdisk output:




Disk /dev/sdd: 28.5 GB, 28521267200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders, total 55705600 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 32768 122814463 61390848 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT






14.04 usb sd-card






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:25









Community

1




1










asked Dec 9 '14 at 22:22









Paul GregoirePaul Gregoire

418513




418513












  • Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

    – Mark Williams
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:45











  • Added fdisk output

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:59











  • That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

    – Xen2050
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:30











  • Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:42











  • Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 1:20


















  • Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

    – Mark Williams
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:45











  • Added fdisk output

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 9 '14 at 23:59











  • That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

    – Xen2050
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:30











  • Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 0:42











  • Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

    – Paul Gregoire
    Dec 10 '14 at 1:20

















Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45





Can you show the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdd ?

– Mark Williams
Dec 9 '14 at 23:45













Added fdisk output

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59





Added fdisk output

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 9 '14 at 23:59













That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30





That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok? Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?

– Xen2050
Dec 10 '14 at 0:30













Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42





Ill try it on my Windows box and see what happens

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 0:42













Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20






Windows showed 26Gb unformatted, so I put the card into a separate reader and it shows 63Gb; its a limitation of the USB device I was using. Thanks for the input guys.

– Paul Gregoire
Dec 10 '14 at 1:20











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?



Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?



There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
    If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?






    share|improve this answer























    • It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

      – Paul Gregoire
      Dec 10 '14 at 1:18


















    0














    This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.



    For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).



    To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.



    Product ID: 0x6200
    Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
    Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
    (gotta love that serial number)



    -Greg






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "89"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f558594%2fmount-problem-with-64gb-microsdxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?



      Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?



      There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.






      share|improve this answer



























        2














        That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?



        Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?



        There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.






        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?



          Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?



          There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.






          share|improve this answer













          That's unusual. Did the card work on windows with the same card reader, and writing more than 32GB worked ok?



          Any changes with a different card reader, in Ubuntu or windows?



          There are lots of differing card readers of varying quality, some slower, some unreliable, some can't handle SDHC or SDXC (like this one) even though they may advertise they can.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 10 '14 at 2:55









          Xen2050Xen2050

          6,88622343




          6,88622343























              1














              This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
              If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?






              share|improve this answer























              • It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

                – Paul Gregoire
                Dec 10 '14 at 1:18















              1














              This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
              If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?






              share|improve this answer























              • It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

                – Paul Gregoire
                Dec 10 '14 at 1:18













              1












              1








              1







              This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
              If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?






              share|improve this answer













              This looks like a job for gparted - install it if not already done so, unmount the disk (either 1st or when it prompts you to), & see if you can extend it to 64g.
              If not, it may be a problem with your card reader?







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Dec 10 '14 at 0:26









              Mark WilliamsMark Williams

              2,335820




              2,335820












              • It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

                – Paul Gregoire
                Dec 10 '14 at 1:18

















              • It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

                – Paul Gregoire
                Dec 10 '14 at 1:18
















              It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

              – Paul Gregoire
              Dec 10 '14 at 1:18





              It turns out that its a limitation of the USB device.

              – Paul Gregoire
              Dec 10 '14 at 1:18











              0














              This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.



              For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).



              To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.



              Product ID: 0x6200
              Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
              Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
              (gotta love that serial number)



              -Greg






              share|improve this answer





























                0














                This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.



                For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).



                To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.



                Product ID: 0x6200
                Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
                Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
                (gotta love that serial number)



                -Greg






                share|improve this answer



























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.



                  For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).



                  To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.



                  Product ID: 0x6200
                  Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
                  Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
                  (gotta love that serial number)



                  -Greg






                  share|improve this answer















                  This kind of problem occurs with under-performing adapters.



                  For example, I am see the same kind of problem with a Kingston branded microSD-to-USB adapter which scans as containing a Silicon Motion USB interface chip. In my case, the microSD card is 128GB but consistently shows up as 24.78 GB when this particular adapter is used. It's not a partition issue, obviously, and the problem with this adapter appears on different computers (both OS X and Linux).



                  To be clear: the Silicon Motion (Kingston) adapter is clearly defective. I suspect it's not able to handle SDXC, or maybe it's too slow for the USB interfaces of today.



                  Product ID: 0x6200
                  Vendor ID: 0x090c (Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan)
                  Serial Number: 12345678901234567890
                  (gotta love that serial number)



                  -Greg







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered Apr 2 '18 at 16:06









                  GregDGregD

                  1012




                  1012



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f558594%2fmount-problem-with-64gb-microsdxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

                      Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

                      Torre de la Isleta Índice Véase también Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación38°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.3838888938°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.38388889Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta o Torre Saleta. Base de datos de bienes inmuebles. Patrimonio Cultural. Secretaría de Estado de CulturaFicha BIC Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta. Dirección General de Patrimonio Cultural. Generalitat ValencianaLugares de interés. Ayuntamiento del CampelloTorre de la Isleta en CastillosNet.org