Sampling from Gaussian mixture models, when are the sampled data independent?Central moments of a gaussian mixture density?Whitening a mixture of GaussiansGaussian mixture regression in higher dimensionsGMM weighting change during marginalizationdoubt regarding the gaussian mixture model definitionDecompose/split a single multivariate gauss into random gaussian mixtureConditional distribution for Gibbs sampling for Gaussian mixturePractical considerations on a mixture of Multivariate Normals, with many termsCan we apply Gaussian mixture model to all kinds of scensrios where some variables are unobserved?Why use a Gaussian mixture model?

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Translation of 答えを知っている人はいませんでした

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Finding the minimum value of a function without using Calculus

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Graphic representation of a triangle using ArrayPlot

Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire

Are small insurances worth it?

Writing text next to a table

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

How to install round brake pads

Create chunks from an array

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Converting from "matrix" data into "coordinate" data

The (Easy) Road to Code

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Too soon for a plot twist?

"If + would" conditional in present perfect tense

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?



Sampling from Gaussian mixture models, when are the sampled data independent?


Central moments of a gaussian mixture density?Whitening a mixture of GaussiansGaussian mixture regression in higher dimensionsGMM weighting change during marginalizationdoubt regarding the gaussian mixture model definitionDecompose/split a single multivariate gauss into random gaussian mixtureConditional distribution for Gibbs sampling for Gaussian mixturePractical considerations on a mixture of Multivariate Normals, with many termsCan we apply Gaussian mixture model to all kinds of scensrios where some variables are unobserved?Why use a Gaussian mixture model?













2












$begingroup$


Suppose I generate a Gaussian mixture model with $N$ Gaussian distributions



$p(x) = sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$



where $w_i$ are the weights.



Now I sample some points $x_n$ from $p(x)$



What condition is needed to ensure that the points are independent from each other?



Is it sufficient to assume that each component $mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$ have diagonal covariance matrix $Sigma_i$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose I generate a Gaussian mixture model with $N$ Gaussian distributions



    $p(x) = sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$



    where $w_i$ are the weights.



    Now I sample some points $x_n$ from $p(x)$



    What condition is needed to ensure that the points are independent from each other?



    Is it sufficient to assume that each component $mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$ have diagonal covariance matrix $Sigma_i$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose I generate a Gaussian mixture model with $N$ Gaussian distributions



      $p(x) = sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$



      where $w_i$ are the weights.



      Now I sample some points $x_n$ from $p(x)$



      What condition is needed to ensure that the points are independent from each other?



      Is it sufficient to assume that each component $mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$ have diagonal covariance matrix $Sigma_i$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose I generate a Gaussian mixture model with $N$ Gaussian distributions



      $p(x) = sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$



      where $w_i$ are the weights.



      Now I sample some points $x_n$ from $p(x)$



      What condition is needed to ensure that the points are independent from each other?



      Is it sufficient to assume that each component $mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)$ have diagonal covariance matrix $Sigma_i$?







      normal-distribution mixed-model random-variable independence gaussian-mixture






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      Shamisen ExpertShamisen Expert

      126112




      126112




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          You are confusing independence between the simulated vectors and independence between the components of a single vector. Unless otherwise stated, two simulations $X_1,X_2$ from$$sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)tag1$$will be independent, while the components of the vector $X_1$ will most likely be dependent, even when the matrices $Sigma_i$ are diagonal. (The intuition about that last point is that if $X_11$ is closer to $mu_1k$ than to the other Normal means, then the other components of $X_1$ are also more likely to originate from this same $k$-th element of the mixture.) For instance a most standard way to simulate from (1) is to simulate
          $$Z_1simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_1|Z_1=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$and$$Z_2simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_2|Z_2=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$If the four variables are mutually independent then $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
            $endgroup$
            – Shamisen Expert
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – mb7744
            43 mins ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "65"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396582%2fsampling-from-gaussian-mixture-models-when-are-the-sampled-data-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          You are confusing independence between the simulated vectors and independence between the components of a single vector. Unless otherwise stated, two simulations $X_1,X_2$ from$$sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)tag1$$will be independent, while the components of the vector $X_1$ will most likely be dependent, even when the matrices $Sigma_i$ are diagonal. (The intuition about that last point is that if $X_11$ is closer to $mu_1k$ than to the other Normal means, then the other components of $X_1$ are also more likely to originate from this same $k$-th element of the mixture.) For instance a most standard way to simulate from (1) is to simulate
          $$Z_1simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_1|Z_1=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$and$$Z_2simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_2|Z_2=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$If the four variables are mutually independent then $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
            $endgroup$
            – Shamisen Expert
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – mb7744
            43 mins ago
















          5












          $begingroup$

          You are confusing independence between the simulated vectors and independence between the components of a single vector. Unless otherwise stated, two simulations $X_1,X_2$ from$$sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)tag1$$will be independent, while the components of the vector $X_1$ will most likely be dependent, even when the matrices $Sigma_i$ are diagonal. (The intuition about that last point is that if $X_11$ is closer to $mu_1k$ than to the other Normal means, then the other components of $X_1$ are also more likely to originate from this same $k$-th element of the mixture.) For instance a most standard way to simulate from (1) is to simulate
          $$Z_1simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_1|Z_1=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$and$$Z_2simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_2|Z_2=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$If the four variables are mutually independent then $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
            $endgroup$
            – Shamisen Expert
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – mb7744
            43 mins ago














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          You are confusing independence between the simulated vectors and independence between the components of a single vector. Unless otherwise stated, two simulations $X_1,X_2$ from$$sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)tag1$$will be independent, while the components of the vector $X_1$ will most likely be dependent, even when the matrices $Sigma_i$ are diagonal. (The intuition about that last point is that if $X_11$ is closer to $mu_1k$ than to the other Normal means, then the other components of $X_1$ are also more likely to originate from this same $k$-th element of the mixture.) For instance a most standard way to simulate from (1) is to simulate
          $$Z_1simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_1|Z_1=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$and$$Z_2simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_2|Z_2=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$If the four variables are mutually independent then $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You are confusing independence between the simulated vectors and independence between the components of a single vector. Unless otherwise stated, two simulations $X_1,X_2$ from$$sumlimits_i = 1^N w_i mathcalN(x;mu_i, Sigma_i)tag1$$will be independent, while the components of the vector $X_1$ will most likely be dependent, even when the matrices $Sigma_i$ are diagonal. (The intuition about that last point is that if $X_11$ is closer to $mu_1k$ than to the other Normal means, then the other components of $X_1$ are also more likely to originate from this same $k$-th element of the mixture.) For instance a most standard way to simulate from (1) is to simulate
          $$Z_1simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_1|Z_1=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$and$$Z_2simmathcal M(1;w_1,ldots,w_N)qquad X_2|Z_2=k sim mathcalN(x;mu_k, Sigma_k)$$If the four variables are mutually independent then $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          Xi'anXi'an

          57.9k897360




          57.9k897360











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
            $endgroup$
            – Shamisen Expert
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – mb7744
            43 mins ago

















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
            $endgroup$
            – Shamisen Expert
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – mb7744
            43 mins ago
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
          $endgroup$
          – Shamisen Expert
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your answer. What is the meaning of $mathcalM$? Can you justify intuitively why the $X_1, X_2$ will most likely to be independent (this is clearer to me), whereas the components of $X_1$ will be dependent (this is not as clear to me)?
          $endgroup$
          – Shamisen Expert
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – mb7744
          43 mins ago





          $begingroup$
          Xi'an is using $mathcalM$ to denote the multinomial distribution. With the first parameter $n$ set to 1, the multinomial is also known as the categorical distribution. A categorical random variable takes on one of a finite set of categorical values with probability determined by the second parameter, the $w$ vector. In other words, $Z_i$ represents the group membership of observation $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – mb7744
          43 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396582%2fsampling-from-gaussian-mixture-models-when-are-the-sampled-data-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

          Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

          Antonio De Lisio Carrera Referencias Menú de navegación«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«Cuando los gobiernos subestiman a las localidades: L a Iniciativa para la Integración de la Infraestructura Regional Suramericana (IIRSA) en la frontera Colombo-Venezolana»«Maestría en Planificación Integral del Ambiente»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«Conózcanos»«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»