Which version of Debian are Ubuntu LTS releases based on?What's the difference between a Long Term Support Release and a Normal Release?Is Ubuntu based on Debian unstable or Debian testing?Software versions of LTS and non-LTS releases synced from DebianWhat are point releases in LTS versions?Ubuntu install broken after adding a “Jessie” Debian repositoryWhat Debian version are the different Ubuntu versions based on?Acquiring pre-releases/betas for unreleased distros for testingWhy isn't Chromium up-to-date in all the Ubuntu LTS repos, like Firefox is?On which version of Debian, Ubuntu 17.04 is based on?What can I do to get my package from Debian unstable to next Ubuntu LTS?Ubuntu LTS stability
Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding
PTIJ: Sport in the Torah
Precision notation for voltmeters
I am the person who abides by rules but breaks the rules . Who am I
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?
Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?
Is the differential, dp, exact or not?
How to distinguish easily different soldier of ww2?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
Who has more? Ireland or Iceland?
How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?
How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff
Draw this image in the TIKZ package
Inorganic chemistry handbook with reaction lists
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?
Paper published similar to PhD thesis
Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?
Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?
Which version of Debian are Ubuntu LTS releases based on?
What's the difference between a Long Term Support Release and a Normal Release?Is Ubuntu based on Debian unstable or Debian testing?Software versions of LTS and non-LTS releases synced from DebianWhat are point releases in LTS versions?Ubuntu install broken after adding a “Jessie” Debian repositoryWhat Debian version are the different Ubuntu versions based on?Acquiring pre-releases/betas for unreleased distros for testingWhy isn't Chromium up-to-date in all the Ubuntu LTS repos, like Firefox is?On which version of Debian, Ubuntu 17.04 is based on?What can I do to get my package from Debian unstable to next Ubuntu LTS?Ubuntu LTS stability
This answer says:
The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.
That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.
So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?
debian lts release-management
add a comment |
This answer says:
The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.
That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.
So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?
debian lts release-management
add a comment |
This answer says:
The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.
That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.
So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?
debian lts release-management
This answer says:
The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.
That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.
So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?
debian lts release-management
debian lts release-management
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:23
Community♦
1
1
asked Jun 16 '12 at 12:16
barnac1ebarnac1e
84117
84117
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
That part of that answer is wrong.
LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing
From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
- We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.
- [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
- We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.
The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
"Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"
https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
add a comment |
Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.
For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).
Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.
Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.
add a comment |
Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.
(Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f151698%2fwhich-version-of-debian-are-ubuntu-lts-releases-based-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
That part of that answer is wrong.
LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing
From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
- We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.
- [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
- We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.
The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
That part of that answer is wrong.
LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing
From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
- We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.
- [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
- We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.
The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
That part of that answer is wrong.
LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing
From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
- We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.
- [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
- We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.
The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.
That part of that answer is wrong.
LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing
From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
- We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.
- [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
- We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.
The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.
edited Jun 16 '12 at 12:53
answered Jun 16 '12 at 12:48
ishish
116k31268294
116k31268294
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.
– tumbleweed
Nov 12 '13 at 10:19
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".
– Apteryx
Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
"Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"
https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
add a comment |
This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
"Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"
https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
add a comment |
This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
"Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"
https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
"Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"
https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
answered Oct 30 '13 at 15:42
andyandy
5111
5111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.
For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).
Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.
Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.
add a comment |
Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.
For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).
Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.
Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.
add a comment |
Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.
For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).
Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.
Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.
Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.
For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).
Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.
Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.
answered 9 hours ago
Peter GreenPeter Green
1,3351610
1,3351610
add a comment |
add a comment |
Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.
(Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
add a comment |
Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.
(Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
add a comment |
Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.
(Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)
Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.
(Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)
answered May 10 '13 at 2:08
GuestGuest
9
9
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
add a comment |
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)
– Thomas Ward♦
May 10 '13 at 3:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f151698%2fwhich-version-of-debian-are-ubuntu-lts-releases-based-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown