Which version of Debian are Ubuntu LTS releases based on?What's the difference between a Long Term Support Release and a Normal Release?Is Ubuntu based on Debian unstable or Debian testing?Software versions of LTS and non-LTS releases synced from DebianWhat are point releases in LTS versions?Ubuntu install broken after adding a “Jessie” Debian repositoryWhat Debian version are the different Ubuntu versions based on?Acquiring pre-releases/betas for unreleased distros for testingWhy isn't Chromium up-to-date in all the Ubuntu LTS repos, like Firefox is?On which version of Debian, Ubuntu 17.04 is based on?What can I do to get my package from Debian unstable to next Ubuntu LTS?Ubuntu LTS stability

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

PTIJ: Sport in the Torah

Precision notation for voltmeters

I am the person who abides by rules but breaks the rules . Who am I

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Is the differential, dp, exact or not?

How to distinguish easily different soldier of ww2?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

Who has more? Ireland or Iceland?

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Draw this image in the TIKZ package

Inorganic chemistry handbook with reaction lists

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Paper published similar to PhD thesis

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?



Which version of Debian are Ubuntu LTS releases based on?


What's the difference between a Long Term Support Release and a Normal Release?Is Ubuntu based on Debian unstable or Debian testing?Software versions of LTS and non-LTS releases synced from DebianWhat are point releases in LTS versions?Ubuntu install broken after adding a “Jessie” Debian repositoryWhat Debian version are the different Ubuntu versions based on?Acquiring pre-releases/betas for unreleased distros for testingWhy isn't Chromium up-to-date in all the Ubuntu LTS repos, like Firefox is?On which version of Debian, Ubuntu 17.04 is based on?What can I do to get my package from Debian unstable to next Ubuntu LTS?Ubuntu LTS stability













9















This answer says:




The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.




That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.



So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?










share|improve this question




























    9















    This answer says:




    The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.




    That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.



    So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?










    share|improve this question


























      9












      9








      9


      3






      This answer says:




      The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.




      That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.



      So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?










      share|improve this question
















      This answer says:




      The base of the operating system, Debian, comes in three versions: Stable, Testing and Unstable. Normally, Ubuntu is based on Testing; the LTS releases are based on Stable.




      That cannot be true then for 12.04 because Debian Stable (Squeeze) is almost going to be old-stable, and it's obvious that the kernel versions in 12.04, packages, etc. cannot have come from Debian Squeeze.



      So then what other Debian Stable is there for Precise to be based on?







      debian lts release-management






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:23









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Jun 16 '12 at 12:16









      barnac1ebarnac1e

      84117




      84117




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          That part of that answer is wrong.



          LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing



          From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:




          • We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.

          • [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
            • We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.




          The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.






          share|improve this answer

























          • LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

            – tumbleweed
            Nov 12 '13 at 10:19












          • Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

            – Apteryx
            Feb 20 '18 at 14:11


















          5














          This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
          "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"



          https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS






          share|improve this answer






























            0














            Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.



            For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).



            Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.



            Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.






            share|improve this answer






























              -1














              Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.



              (Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)






              share|improve this answer























              • They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                – Thomas Ward
                May 10 '13 at 3:07










              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "89"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f151698%2fwhich-version-of-debian-are-ubuntu-lts-releases-based-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7














              That part of that answer is wrong.



              LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing



              From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:




              • We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.

              • [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
                • We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.




              The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.






              share|improve this answer

























              • LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

                – tumbleweed
                Nov 12 '13 at 10:19












              • Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

                – Apteryx
                Feb 20 '18 at 14:11















              7














              That part of that answer is wrong.



              LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing



              From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:




              • We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.

              • [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
                • We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.




              The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.






              share|improve this answer

























              • LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

                – tumbleweed
                Nov 12 '13 at 10:19












              • Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

                – Apteryx
                Feb 20 '18 at 14:11













              7












              7








              7







              That part of that answer is wrong.



              LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing



              From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:




              • We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.

              • [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
                • We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.




              The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.






              share|improve this answer















              That part of that answer is wrong.



              LTS is based (mostly) on debian-testing



              From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:




              • We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable.

              • [LTS is not] Cutting Edge: Instead of doing an automatic full package import from Debian unstable, we will do it from Debian testing. The benefit we gain from not introducing new bugs and/or regressions outweighs the new features and/or fixes we often get from unstable.
                • We reserve the right to selectively pull in updates from unstable, if we believe the stability of the package in Debian is better than what is in the current Ubuntu archive.




              The obvious corollary is that non-LTS releases are based, for the most part, on Debian unstable.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jun 16 '12 at 12:53

























              answered Jun 16 '12 at 12:48









              ishish

              116k31268294




              116k31268294












              • LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

                – tumbleweed
                Nov 12 '13 at 10:19












              • Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

                – Apteryx
                Feb 20 '18 at 14:11

















              • LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

                – tumbleweed
                Nov 12 '13 at 10:19












              • Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

                – Apteryx
                Feb 20 '18 at 14:11
















              LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

              – tumbleweed
              Nov 12 '13 at 10:19






              LTSs aren't always synced from testing (by policy). But for every LTS, we've individually made the decision to sync from testing.

              – tumbleweed
              Nov 12 '13 at 10:19














              Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

              – Apteryx
              Feb 20 '18 at 14:11





              Not true anymore, per you link: "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable".

              – Apteryx
              Feb 20 '18 at 14:11













              5














              This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
              "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"



              https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS






              share|improve this answer



























                5














                This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
                "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"



                https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS






                share|improve this answer

























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
                  "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"



                  https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS






                  share|improve this answer













                  This appears to have changed recently per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS:
                  "Starting with the 14.04 LTS development cycle, automatic full package import is performed from Debian unstable"



                  https://web.archive.org/web/20131030153921/https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 30 '13 at 15:42









                  andyandy

                  5111




                  5111





















                      0














                      Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.



                      For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).



                      Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.



                      Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        0














                        Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.



                        For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).



                        Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.



                        Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.



                          For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).



                          Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.



                          Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Ubuntu releases are based first and foremost on the previous Ubuntu release.



                          For a portion of the Ubuntu release cycle, source packages which are not locally modified in Ubuntu are auto-synced from Debian. Normally this auto-sync is from Unstable but for some earlier LTS releases it was from testing instead. It is also possible for packages to be manually synced from Debian either because local modifications in Ubuntu are no longer needed or because there is a desire to sync a newer version from Debian experimental (or unstable in the case of releases where the auto-sync was from testing).



                          Nowadays package updates (whether from the auto-sync, manual sync or from uploads) initially go into a special section of the archive called "proposed", they only get transferred to release when they pass certain checks.



                          Furthermore many of the core packages in Ubuntu are locally modified and Ubuntu is often ahead of Debian on versions for such packages.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 9 hours ago









                          Peter GreenPeter Green

                          1,3351610




                          1,3351610





















                              -1














                              Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.



                              (Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)






                              share|improve this answer























                              • They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                                – Thomas Ward
                                May 10 '13 at 3:07















                              -1














                              Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.



                              (Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)






                              share|improve this answer























                              • They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                                – Thomas Ward
                                May 10 '13 at 3:07













                              -1












                              -1








                              -1







                              Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.



                              (Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)






                              share|improve this answer













                              Normally, Ubuntu is based on Unstable. LTS versions are based on Testing, which will eventually become stable. Precise Pangolin is based on Wheezy. Wheezy was Testing at the time Precise was released, but now Wheezy is stable.



                              (Note: if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, else I mislead people.)







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered May 10 '13 at 2:08









                              GuestGuest

                              9




                              9












                              • They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                                – Thomas Ward
                                May 10 '13 at 3:07

















                              • They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                                – Thomas Ward
                                May 10 '13 at 3:07
















                              They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                              – Thomas Ward
                              May 10 '13 at 3:07





                              They autosync from Unstable usually, but they can sync from other releases when requested (like from Debian Experimental)

                              – Thomas Ward
                              May 10 '13 at 3:07

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f151698%2fwhich-version-of-debian-are-ubuntu-lts-releases-based-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

                              Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

                              Torre de la Isleta Índice Véase también Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación38°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.3838888938°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.38388889Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta o Torre Saleta. Base de datos de bienes inmuebles. Patrimonio Cultural. Secretaría de Estado de CulturaFicha BIC Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta. Dirección General de Patrimonio Cultural. Generalitat ValencianaLugares de interés. Ayuntamiento del CampelloTorre de la Isleta en CastillosNet.org