Shouldn't critical netboot fixes propagate back to the base image?How can I create the smallest possible mirror of the archive?Where is the netboot image?Is there a way to install ubuntu to Windows ME without a USB drive or burning a disk?“Something wicked happened” error in apt-getmaas-import-pxe-files error with md5sumFailed to fetch repositories; a particular caseSelect and install software / Installation step failedUbuntu Server installation fails on Thinkpad 400 laptopwhat is the default content of /etc/apt/sources.list in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)How to setup squid-deb-proxy and squid-deb-proxy-client to be more autonomous (to work without internet)?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?
Continuity at a point in terms of closure
What makes Graph invariants so useful/important?
How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?
Modification to Chariots for Heavy Cavalry Analogue for 4-armed race
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
whey we use polarized capacitor?
Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?
Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).
Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?
Shouldn't critical netboot fixes propagate back to the base image?
How can I create the smallest possible mirror of the archive?Where is the netboot image?Is there a way to install ubuntu to Windows ME without a USB drive or burning a disk?“Something wicked happened” error in apt-getmaas-import-pxe-files error with md5sumFailed to fetch repositories; a particular caseSelect and install software / Installation step failedUbuntu Server installation fails on Thinkpad 400 laptopwhat is the default content of /etc/apt/sources.list in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)How to setup squid-deb-proxy and squid-deb-proxy-client to be more autonomous (to work without internet)?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
system-installation updates pxe
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
asked 10 mins ago
DougDoug
11
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1131988%2fshouldnt-critical-netboot-fixes-propagate-back-to-the-base-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1131988%2fshouldnt-critical-netboot-fixes-propagate-back-to-the-base-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
