Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?Are there two answers to this integral problem?Help with understanding the solution to a volume of a solid $y = x, y = 0, x = 4, x = 7$ about $x = 1$Evaluate the Line IntegralRelated Rates- Expanding CircleEvaluating area using an integral in polar coordinatesWithout solving directly for the integral, decide if the value of the integral is positve or negative.Contour integral of $int_gamma fraczsin zdz$Evaluating integral $iint_D 2x-y ,dA$ bounded by circle of a given radiusArea of a square equivelent to that of a circle utilizing caclulusFinding the volume of a solid s using cross sections

An Accountant Seeks the Help of a Mathematician

Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?

How to simplify this time periods definition interface?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Will a pinhole camera work with instant film?

Can elves maintain concentration in a trance?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

PlotLabels with equations not expressions

Bash: What does "masking return values" mean?

PTIJ: Who should pay for Uber rides: the child or the parent?

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?

How can I change step-down my variable input voltage? [Microcontroller]

Old race car problem/puzzle

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Happy pi day, everyone!

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Did CPM support custom hardware using device drivers?

RegionDifference for Cylinder and Cuboid



Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?


Are there two answers to this integral problem?Help with understanding the solution to a volume of a solid $y = x, y = 0, x = 4, x = 7$ about $x = 1$Evaluate the Line IntegralRelated Rates- Expanding CircleEvaluating area using an integral in polar coordinatesWithout solving directly for the integral, decide if the value of the integral is positve or negative.Contour integral of $int_gamma fraczsin zdz$Evaluating integral $iint_D 2x-y ,dA$ bounded by circle of a given radiusArea of a square equivelent to that of a circle utilizing caclulusFinding the volume of a solid s using cross sections













4












$begingroup$


I am a freshman enrolled at an American University. Recently, I took an examination in which the following problem appeared:



Evaluate the following integral:



$int_0^4sqrt16-x^2dx$



My answer: 4$pi$, was correct. However, I received reduced credit for this answer because I did not solve it correctly (according to the professor). The exams are time-limited and have a fair amount of content, so when I saw this problem, I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.



The context of the test was surrounding our unit on inverse trigonometry and integration by parts. This section of the test did not list any other instructions besides evaluating the definite integrals. I've talked to my professor about it and his only response was that I solved it wrong:



To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.



Is my interpretation of evaluating the integral different? Does the instruction "Find the antiderivative and then evaluate" not need to exist for that to be required?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    you profesor in mixed up
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    can you post the exact problem question?
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


I am a freshman enrolled at an American University. Recently, I took an examination in which the following problem appeared:



Evaluate the following integral:



$int_0^4sqrt16-x^2dx$



My answer: 4$pi$, was correct. However, I received reduced credit for this answer because I did not solve it correctly (according to the professor). The exams are time-limited and have a fair amount of content, so when I saw this problem, I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.



The context of the test was surrounding our unit on inverse trigonometry and integration by parts. This section of the test did not list any other instructions besides evaluating the definite integrals. I've talked to my professor about it and his only response was that I solved it wrong:



To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.



Is my interpretation of evaluating the integral different? Does the instruction "Find the antiderivative and then evaluate" not need to exist for that to be required?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    you profesor in mixed up
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    can you post the exact problem question?
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I am a freshman enrolled at an American University. Recently, I took an examination in which the following problem appeared:



Evaluate the following integral:



$int_0^4sqrt16-x^2dx$



My answer: 4$pi$, was correct. However, I received reduced credit for this answer because I did not solve it correctly (according to the professor). The exams are time-limited and have a fair amount of content, so when I saw this problem, I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.



The context of the test was surrounding our unit on inverse trigonometry and integration by parts. This section of the test did not list any other instructions besides evaluating the definite integrals. I've talked to my professor about it and his only response was that I solved it wrong:



To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.



Is my interpretation of evaluating the integral different? Does the instruction "Find the antiderivative and then evaluate" not need to exist for that to be required?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am a freshman enrolled at an American University. Recently, I took an examination in which the following problem appeared:



Evaluate the following integral:



$int_0^4sqrt16-x^2dx$



My answer: 4$pi$, was correct. However, I received reduced credit for this answer because I did not solve it correctly (according to the professor). The exams are time-limited and have a fair amount of content, so when I saw this problem, I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.



The context of the test was surrounding our unit on inverse trigonometry and integration by parts. This section of the test did not list any other instructions besides evaluating the definite integrals. I've talked to my professor about it and his only response was that I solved it wrong:



To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.



Is my interpretation of evaluating the integral different? Does the instruction "Find the antiderivative and then evaluate" not need to exist for that to be required?



Thank you.







calculus integration






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









user146073user146073

212




212




New contributor




user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user146073 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    you profesor in mixed up
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    can you post the exact problem question?
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    you profesor in mixed up
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    can you post the exact problem question?
    $endgroup$
    – Mikey Spivak
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
you profesor in mixed up
$endgroup$
– Mikey Spivak
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
you profesor in mixed up
$endgroup$
– Mikey Spivak
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
can you post the exact problem question?
$endgroup$
– Mikey Spivak
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
can you post the exact problem question?
$endgroup$
– Mikey Spivak
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
$endgroup$
– user146073
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MikeySpivak The question sheet is no longer in my possession, but I remember exactly what it said "Evaluate the following integrals:" (there were several). I wrote the integral exactly as it appeared.
$endgroup$
– user146073
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
He was obviously nitpicking, since you were able to bypass a direct (tedious) evaluation, which is what he wanted.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
$endgroup$
– user146073
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@herbsteinberg Would I be justified to go higher up in the math department with this? In a course where every point matters?
$endgroup$
– user146073
2 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

I've done some undergraduate teaching and my policy is always if you get the correct answer by any means then you get full credit, but others have different policies and it's really up to them.



You could argue your case. Your professor could argue back that solving the integral by trig substitution does not require the formula $A = pi r^2$, and he did not permit the use of that formula. He could argue that using that formula entails circular reasoning (the formula for the area of a circle has to be gotten by some limiting or integration method equivalent to evaluating $int_-r^r sqrtr^2-x^2dx$).



It could go either way for you. But I think it would be a waste of your and your professor's time.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    +1 for "circular reasoning".
    $endgroup$
    – JonathanZ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Got eem $space$
    $endgroup$
    – D_S
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
    $endgroup$
    – user146073
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
    $endgroup$
    – D_S
    56 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

An argument could be made that you should include a proof that the integral evaluates the area of a half-disk, rather than just asserting the answer.



Whether you “should” have gotten full points is more a matter of pedagogy than of mathematics, but as a practical tip: using (correct) method Y to solve a problem with instructions to use method X (especially in an intro class and when you are not familiar with the instructor and their teaching philosophy) is always a gamble.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    As a student who has had a similar thing happen and heard of it happening to others, my personal recommendation would be to not bring it up again, it will probably be a losing battle. :(



    But I would not consider your method "wrong" or "incorrect." There are many ways to solve a problem, you simply just made use of one of them, that wasn't the desired one.



    As long as you explained how you came to your answer, the reason why your professor $textitprobably$ marked you down is that based on the class and section the test covered, the question was designed so that you would display and make use of your knowledge of trig substitution to solve the problem.



    I would hope your professor didn't take too many points off (since the method does work), but in these classes you will usually be expected to give the professor a specific method that they are looking for.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$


      I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.




      Did you write this clearly in your test (as you did here)? If not, it is fair to give reduced points. One should always explain where answers come from. If yes, proceed reading.




      To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.




      Do the instructions clearly disallow your solution? If not, it was not fair to you, and you should insist on it. If yes, read further.



      Were these instructions available a priori, or they were included in the test itself? If available a priori, you should have complained about them before the test. If not, the instructions are unfair, and you should try to insist about it as well.



      Also, recall that most of this is up to the professor, so you might be with bad luck, sadly.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        user146073 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148705%2fcalculus-ii-professor-will-not-accept-my-correct-integral-evaluation-that-uses-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4












        $begingroup$

        I've done some undergraduate teaching and my policy is always if you get the correct answer by any means then you get full credit, but others have different policies and it's really up to them.



        You could argue your case. Your professor could argue back that solving the integral by trig substitution does not require the formula $A = pi r^2$, and he did not permit the use of that formula. He could argue that using that formula entails circular reasoning (the formula for the area of a circle has to be gotten by some limiting or integration method equivalent to evaluating $int_-r^r sqrtr^2-x^2dx$).



        It could go either way for you. But I think it would be a waste of your and your professor's time.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          +1 for "circular reasoning".
          $endgroup$
          – JonathanZ
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Got eem $space$
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
          $endgroup$
          – user146073
          1 hour ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          56 mins ago















        4












        $begingroup$

        I've done some undergraduate teaching and my policy is always if you get the correct answer by any means then you get full credit, but others have different policies and it's really up to them.



        You could argue your case. Your professor could argue back that solving the integral by trig substitution does not require the formula $A = pi r^2$, and he did not permit the use of that formula. He could argue that using that formula entails circular reasoning (the formula for the area of a circle has to be gotten by some limiting or integration method equivalent to evaluating $int_-r^r sqrtr^2-x^2dx$).



        It could go either way for you. But I think it would be a waste of your and your professor's time.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          +1 for "circular reasoning".
          $endgroup$
          – JonathanZ
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Got eem $space$
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
          $endgroup$
          – user146073
          1 hour ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          56 mins ago













        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        I've done some undergraduate teaching and my policy is always if you get the correct answer by any means then you get full credit, but others have different policies and it's really up to them.



        You could argue your case. Your professor could argue back that solving the integral by trig substitution does not require the formula $A = pi r^2$, and he did not permit the use of that formula. He could argue that using that formula entails circular reasoning (the formula for the area of a circle has to be gotten by some limiting or integration method equivalent to evaluating $int_-r^r sqrtr^2-x^2dx$).



        It could go either way for you. But I think it would be a waste of your and your professor's time.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I've done some undergraduate teaching and my policy is always if you get the correct answer by any means then you get full credit, but others have different policies and it's really up to them.



        You could argue your case. Your professor could argue back that solving the integral by trig substitution does not require the formula $A = pi r^2$, and he did not permit the use of that formula. He could argue that using that formula entails circular reasoning (the formula for the area of a circle has to be gotten by some limiting or integration method equivalent to evaluating $int_-r^r sqrtr^2-x^2dx$).



        It could go either way for you. But I think it would be a waste of your and your professor's time.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        D_SD_S

        13.8k61552




        13.8k61552







        • 5




          $begingroup$
          +1 for "circular reasoning".
          $endgroup$
          – JonathanZ
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Got eem $space$
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
          $endgroup$
          – user146073
          1 hour ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          56 mins ago












        • 5




          $begingroup$
          +1 for "circular reasoning".
          $endgroup$
          – JonathanZ
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Got eem $space$
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
          $endgroup$
          – user146073
          1 hour ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
          $endgroup$
          – D_S
          56 mins ago







        5




        5




        $begingroup$
        +1 for "circular reasoning".
        $endgroup$
        – JonathanZ
        1 hour ago




        $begingroup$
        +1 for "circular reasoning".
        $endgroup$
        – JonathanZ
        1 hour ago












        $begingroup$
        Got eem $space$
        $endgroup$
        – D_S
        1 hour ago




        $begingroup$
        Got eem $space$
        $endgroup$
        – D_S
        1 hour ago












        $begingroup$
        Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
        $endgroup$
        – user146073
        1 hour ago




        $begingroup$
        Thank you for the response, fair enough, I don't think I'll pursue further. This made a lot of sense.
        $endgroup$
        – user146073
        1 hour ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
        $endgroup$
        – D_S
        56 mins ago




        $begingroup$
        Even if you lost points, good on you for noticing a slick way to solve the problem instead of mindlessly grinding out a trig substitution
        $endgroup$
        – D_S
        56 mins ago











        3












        $begingroup$

        An argument could be made that you should include a proof that the integral evaluates the area of a half-disk, rather than just asserting the answer.



        Whether you “should” have gotten full points is more a matter of pedagogy than of mathematics, but as a practical tip: using (correct) method Y to solve a problem with instructions to use method X (especially in an intro class and when you are not familiar with the instructor and their teaching philosophy) is always a gamble.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3












          $begingroup$

          An argument could be made that you should include a proof that the integral evaluates the area of a half-disk, rather than just asserting the answer.



          Whether you “should” have gotten full points is more a matter of pedagogy than of mathematics, but as a practical tip: using (correct) method Y to solve a problem with instructions to use method X (especially in an intro class and when you are not familiar with the instructor and their teaching philosophy) is always a gamble.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            An argument could be made that you should include a proof that the integral evaluates the area of a half-disk, rather than just asserting the answer.



            Whether you “should” have gotten full points is more a matter of pedagogy than of mathematics, but as a practical tip: using (correct) method Y to solve a problem with instructions to use method X (especially in an intro class and when you are not familiar with the instructor and their teaching philosophy) is always a gamble.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            An argument could be made that you should include a proof that the integral evaluates the area of a half-disk, rather than just asserting the answer.



            Whether you “should” have gotten full points is more a matter of pedagogy than of mathematics, but as a practical tip: using (correct) method Y to solve a problem with instructions to use method X (especially in an intro class and when you are not familiar with the instructor and their teaching philosophy) is always a gamble.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            user7530user7530

            34.9k761113




            34.9k761113





















                1












                $begingroup$

                As a student who has had a similar thing happen and heard of it happening to others, my personal recommendation would be to not bring it up again, it will probably be a losing battle. :(



                But I would not consider your method "wrong" or "incorrect." There are many ways to solve a problem, you simply just made use of one of them, that wasn't the desired one.



                As long as you explained how you came to your answer, the reason why your professor $textitprobably$ marked you down is that based on the class and section the test covered, the question was designed so that you would display and make use of your knowledge of trig substitution to solve the problem.



                I would hope your professor didn't take too many points off (since the method does work), but in these classes you will usually be expected to give the professor a specific method that they are looking for.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  As a student who has had a similar thing happen and heard of it happening to others, my personal recommendation would be to not bring it up again, it will probably be a losing battle. :(



                  But I would not consider your method "wrong" or "incorrect." There are many ways to solve a problem, you simply just made use of one of them, that wasn't the desired one.



                  As long as you explained how you came to your answer, the reason why your professor $textitprobably$ marked you down is that based on the class and section the test covered, the question was designed so that you would display and make use of your knowledge of trig substitution to solve the problem.



                  I would hope your professor didn't take too many points off (since the method does work), but in these classes you will usually be expected to give the professor a specific method that they are looking for.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    As a student who has had a similar thing happen and heard of it happening to others, my personal recommendation would be to not bring it up again, it will probably be a losing battle. :(



                    But I would not consider your method "wrong" or "incorrect." There are many ways to solve a problem, you simply just made use of one of them, that wasn't the desired one.



                    As long as you explained how you came to your answer, the reason why your professor $textitprobably$ marked you down is that based on the class and section the test covered, the question was designed so that you would display and make use of your knowledge of trig substitution to solve the problem.



                    I would hope your professor didn't take too many points off (since the method does work), but in these classes you will usually be expected to give the professor a specific method that they are looking for.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    As a student who has had a similar thing happen and heard of it happening to others, my personal recommendation would be to not bring it up again, it will probably be a losing battle. :(



                    But I would not consider your method "wrong" or "incorrect." There are many ways to solve a problem, you simply just made use of one of them, that wasn't the desired one.



                    As long as you explained how you came to your answer, the reason why your professor $textitprobably$ marked you down is that based on the class and section the test covered, the question was designed so that you would display and make use of your knowledge of trig substitution to solve the problem.



                    I would hope your professor didn't take too many points off (since the method does work), but in these classes you will usually be expected to give the professor a specific method that they are looking for.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    HotdogHotdog

                    627




                    627





















                        0












                        $begingroup$


                        I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.




                        Did you write this clearly in your test (as you did here)? If not, it is fair to give reduced points. One should always explain where answers come from. If yes, proceed reading.




                        To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.




                        Do the instructions clearly disallow your solution? If not, it was not fair to you, and you should insist on it. If yes, read further.



                        Were these instructions available a priori, or they were included in the test itself? If available a priori, you should have complained about them before the test. If not, the instructions are unfair, and you should try to insist about it as well.



                        Also, recall that most of this is up to the professor, so you might be with bad luck, sadly.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$


                          I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.




                          Did you write this clearly in your test (as you did here)? If not, it is fair to give reduced points. One should always explain where answers come from. If yes, proceed reading.




                          To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.




                          Do the instructions clearly disallow your solution? If not, it was not fair to you, and you should insist on it. If yes, read further.



                          Were these instructions available a priori, or they were included in the test itself? If available a priori, you should have complained about them before the test. If not, the instructions are unfair, and you should try to insist about it as well.



                          Also, recall that most of this is up to the professor, so you might be with bad luck, sadly.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$


                            I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.




                            Did you write this clearly in your test (as you did here)? If not, it is fair to give reduced points. One should always explain where answers come from. If yes, proceed reading.




                            To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.




                            Do the instructions clearly disallow your solution? If not, it was not fair to you, and you should insist on it. If yes, read further.



                            Were these instructions available a priori, or they were included in the test itself? If available a priori, you should have complained about them before the test. If not, the instructions are unfair, and you should try to insist about it as well.



                            Also, recall that most of this is up to the professor, so you might be with bad luck, sadly.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$




                            I noticed it was the equation of the top half of a circle centered at (0, 0) and with radius 4. Knowing this, and my knowledge of the integral indicating the signed area under a curve, I merely took the area of a quarter-circle of radius 4, $frac14$$pi$$r^2$ and wrote my answer of 4$pi$.




                            Did you write this clearly in your test (as you did here)? If not, it is fair to give reduced points. One should always explain where answers come from. If yes, proceed reading.




                            To receive full credit, you would have had to evaluate an integral, as the instructions indicated.




                            Do the instructions clearly disallow your solution? If not, it was not fair to you, and you should insist on it. If yes, read further.



                            Were these instructions available a priori, or they were included in the test itself? If available a priori, you should have complained about them before the test. If not, the instructions are unfair, and you should try to insist about it as well.



                            Also, recall that most of this is up to the professor, so you might be with bad luck, sadly.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            Pedro APedro A

                            2,0461827




                            2,0461827




















                                user146073 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                user146073 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                user146073 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                user146073 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148705%2fcalculus-ii-professor-will-not-accept-my-correct-integral-evaluation-that-uses-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

                                Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

                                Torre de la Isleta Índice Véase también Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación38°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.3838888938°25′58″N 0°23′02″O / 38.43277778, -0.38388889Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta o Torre Saleta. Base de datos de bienes inmuebles. Patrimonio Cultural. Secretaría de Estado de CulturaFicha BIC Torre de la Illeta de l’Horta. Dirección General de Patrimonio Cultural. Generalitat ValencianaLugares de interés. Ayuntamiento del CampelloTorre de la Isleta en CastillosNet.org