Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhy are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

What can I do to 'burn' a journal?

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Presidential Pardon

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Make it rain characters

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

How did the crowd guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?



Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhy are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold










2












$begingroup$


The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



    Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



    If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



    And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




    1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



    2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.







      differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 59 mins ago







      Peter Kagey

















      asked 1 hour ago









      Peter KageyPeter Kagey

      1,57072053




      1,57072053




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



          Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



          See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



          This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



            EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              56 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
              $endgroup$
              – Ted Shifrin
              55 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              It's a nice example; you should leave it.
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              55 mins ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



            Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



            See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



            This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              4












              $begingroup$

              First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



              Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



              See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



              This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 32 mins ago

























                answered 51 mins ago









                Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan

                48.6k344110




                48.6k344110





















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      56 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      55 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      55 mins ago















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      56 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      55 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      55 mins ago













                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 54 mins ago

























                    answered 58 mins ago









                    Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin

                    65k44792




                    65k44792











                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      56 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      55 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      55 mins ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      56 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      55 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      55 mins ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    56 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    56 mins ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    55 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    55 mins ago












                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    55 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    55 mins ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

                    Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

                    Antonio De Lisio Carrera Referencias Menú de navegación«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«Cuando los gobiernos subestiman a las localidades: L a Iniciativa para la Integración de la Infraestructura Regional Suramericana (IIRSA) en la frontera Colombo-Venezolana»«Maestría en Planificación Integral del Ambiente»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«Conózcanos»«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»