How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?How might modern humans leave a message for 50,000 years?How would an aquatic race develop computers?How do we make computers care for human life?How to knock down electronics on a large scale?Keeping supplies for 1000 yearsWhat will cell phones become in 100 years?How to preserve blood with medieval tech?How to preserve scientific knowledge following a major nuclear warWhy would precursors create devices that can survive and still work after hundreds of years?A 500 years vault for books?

I keep switching characters, how do I stop?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Toggle window scroll bar

How to get directions in deep space?

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

Derivative of an interpolated function

What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?

When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?

Taking the numerator and the denominator

Relations between homogeneous polynomials

Why doesn't Gödel's incompleteness theorem apply to false statements?

A seasonal riddle

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?

Could a welfare state co-exist with mega corporations?

1 John in Luther’s Bibel

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

How would a solely written language work mechanically

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached the tenth of the Sun power?



How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?


How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?How might modern humans leave a message for 50,000 years?How would an aquatic race develop computers?How do we make computers care for human life?How to knock down electronics on a large scale?Keeping supplies for 1000 yearsWhat will cell phones become in 100 years?How to preserve blood with medieval tech?How to preserve scientific knowledge following a major nuclear warWhy would precursors create devices that can survive and still work after hundreds of years?A 500 years vault for books?













6












$begingroup$


Let's say you wanted to preserve some electronics for 500 years or more in a museum. What could you do to preserve them in working order for hundreds of years? Deep freeze? Lead lined vaults? Vacuum? I've seen questions about how long electronics would last left unattended, but not how to proactively protect them for 500 years.



Edit #1 - Let's say this is a fully functioning world, not a post apocalyptic world. Think of a museum in the future.



Thanks!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    2 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


Let's say you wanted to preserve some electronics for 500 years or more in a museum. What could you do to preserve them in working order for hundreds of years? Deep freeze? Lead lined vaults? Vacuum? I've seen questions about how long electronics would last left unattended, but not how to proactively protect them for 500 years.



Edit #1 - Let's say this is a fully functioning world, not a post apocalyptic world. Think of a museum in the future.



Thanks!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    2 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


Let's say you wanted to preserve some electronics for 500 years or more in a museum. What could you do to preserve them in working order for hundreds of years? Deep freeze? Lead lined vaults? Vacuum? I've seen questions about how long electronics would last left unattended, but not how to proactively protect them for 500 years.



Edit #1 - Let's say this is a fully functioning world, not a post apocalyptic world. Think of a museum in the future.



Thanks!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let's say you wanted to preserve some electronics for 500 years or more in a museum. What could you do to preserve them in working order for hundreds of years? Deep freeze? Lead lined vaults? Vacuum? I've seen questions about how long electronics would last left unattended, but not how to proactively protect them for 500 years.



Edit #1 - Let's say this is a fully functioning world, not a post apocalyptic world. Think of a museum in the future.



Thanks!







technology preservation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









a CVn

21.9k1291179




21.9k1291179










asked 5 hours ago









farmerstevefarmersteve

1615




1615







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    2 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
$endgroup$
– JBH
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How long could we preserve technology post-apocalypse?
$endgroup$
– JBH
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
$endgroup$
– farmersteve
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
I read that question and nobody gave an answer that satisfies my answer. The answer that was selected didn't provide specific technologies to preserve electronics. Let's say this is a museum that wants to keep ancient tech working. I didn't see that in the question you cite. The question possible duplicate question talks about post apocalyptic world. Let's say this is a Utopian world with fully functioning infrastructure.
$endgroup$
– farmersteve
4 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
@JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@JBH The answer space for these two questions is different; answers there are unlikely to be applicable here, and vice versa. These are not duplicates.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Frostfyre, They appear to be a complete overlap to me. How do they differ?
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
@JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@JBH Well, as the question specifically mentions : unattended vs proactive protection.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
2 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The 5 major things that can degrade electronics are electromagnetism, corrosion, excessive temperatures, vibration, and impact.



Electromagnetism is your number-one risk. It only takes a static shock with 1/2 the amperage it requires to make a visible spark to damage data; also, background EM radiation can degrade data slowly over time. Forensics investigators will often mitigate this risk by putting evidence into a static resistant evidence bag, which can then be placed in a faraday bag escentially blocking out all external EM influence.



The second risk is corrosion. For a device that you are not regularly handling, the only major outside corrosive agent you need to worry about is humidity. An air-tight evidence bag also works well for protecting against this; however, an off the shelf evidence bag may not be rated for 500 years. You would likely need to consult with a polymers expert to design such a bag. Vacuum sealing the bag might be worthwhile, but probably not necessary since the small amount of water vapor locked in the bag will expend itself over time doing negligible corrosion. Batteries (as other answers have pointed out) introduce corrosive elements from within; so, they will need to be drained, stored separately, and possibly rebuilt prior to use.



Excessive heat and cold become the hardest part to control over a 500 year gap. You can not exactly rely on an air conditioning system to be maintained for that long, but if you were to store your device in an underground bunker at a depth of at least 30 feet, mother nature will keep your temperature more or less constant for you.



Vibration mostly just affects things with moving disk drives in them; so, for purposes of preservation, I'm assuming you are talking about stored and not actively used hardware; so, this should be a minimal issue. That said, if you are occasionally powering your device on, it is best to do so on a heavy well secured desk or shelf. Lighter desks/shelves can be vibrated by a computer's fans reducing a computer drive's expected life-time by up to 75%.



Last is impact. If you are storing this device in a room full of engineers going about their daily businesses, eventually someone will knock it off the shelf and break it; so, storing it in a place with very limited human access is also pretty important. This makes keeping an electronic device from breaking within 500 years almost impossible for something that you need to use, but if you're talking about purely storage, you should be able to do this and the above 4 steps and have a pretty good success rate at storing electronics for that long.



In response to Edit #1:



If you are talking about a museum scenario, the mostly likely case would be to copy the data onto a replica, then put the replica on display. Museums rarely put items that fragile and rare on display.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

TL;DR You cannot.



You need purpose-built items, with specially designed components and maybe even ad hoc designs (PSUs without electrolytic capacitors, etc.), capable of withstanding extreme cold.



Otherwise, there are several chemo-physical processes that would require to be halted.



  • Batteries: batteries will degrade over time, and be the first to go. You might want to store the specifications for the required voltage and just hook up a new battery whenever needed.

  • Static memories and hard disks: temperature, background radiation and charge loss are all enemies. You can cool down the apparatuses as far as possible, and shield them. Even so, they'll need to be reactivated and "refreshed" periodically. This is, on a longer timescale, what happens orders of magnitude times faster with DRAMs. Otherwise, the iPad won't boot up, because it no longer remembers how.

  • Welds. Most electronics being built today will die within fifty years at ambient temperature and pressure, due to the little-known fact that solder islands on circuit boards no longer contain lead or antimony, two poisonous metals that are nonetheless among the few cheap things that can prevent (rather, delay) the formation of metal whiskers. Nickel or gold-plated finishings aren't available on market electronics (some sailors might be familiar with the "brass fluff" growing out of cheap zinc-plated irons. On a much smaller scale, this is the same thing).

  • Condenser decay. This afflicts electrolytic capacitors, due to aluminum dioxide breakdown. Extreme cold will delay this process as well as it delays whiskering, but only up to a point - and some components cannot take extreme cold.

  • Insulator decay. Several rubbers and plastic insulating compounds are mixed with volatile plasticizers, where "volatile" means that they won't evaporate or significantly run off in fifty or sixty years... but the risk is there and I wouldn't bet on their seeing their hundredth birthday.

Most components aren't engineered to last at all, because the manufacturers know that the items will be replaced anyway inside, at most, of ten years. Just like ol' Henry Ford, who was said to send forensic teams in junkyards to tell him which parts of his cars had not failed so that he could start manufacturing them with cheaper tolerances. Only, this "controlled obsolescence" makes good business sense, and is actually done.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    40 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 min ago


















2












$begingroup$

If powered down, electronics can last as long as they don't take physical harm, with the exception of batteries and the bearings in moving parts like fans or platter hard drives.



Batteries, sad to say, can't be made to last that long -- or at least the kind that are useful for portable devices like tablets,. notebooks, and smart phones. There's a type of rechargeable battery that has been shown to last a century, and can likely last much longer than that -- the Edison iron battery -- but they have rather poor energy density. In English, that means a battery that can run a tablet for four or five hours continuously is closer in size to a car battery than the little lithium wafer cells our tablets have now.



Nothing would keep those devices from working on external power, however, so it might be worth storing dry-charged lead-acid batteries, which can last indefinitely before filling with acid.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
    $endgroup$
    – GOATNine
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    3 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

In all honesty, electronics are incredibly difficult to preserve, due to the very nature of their components.



Particularly, batteries have a defined shelf life, even when unused. Capacitors and resistors (key components in most electronics) also have a limited lifespan, though they may degrade much more slowly if not in use. Storage media (such as flash memory or hard disks) have a limited life cycle related to the number of read/write operations performed. To have the electronics active, even just displaying a static screen, would likely severely limit the lifespan of any electronic device.



The solution for museum displays would necessarily be restoration/periodic repair. There would have to exist a manufacturing process to produce replacement parts for the duration of the displays existence in the museum.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    12 mins ago


















0












$begingroup$

Preserving electronics for 500 years in working order dictates that they not be used at all in that 500 years.



Copper, in particular, gets brittle as current passes through it and it heats up, and the copper traces in circuit boards even more so. The resistance of the copper joints also goes up.



Electromigration is also a problem.



Unfortunately, the only way you will know if they still work is to turn them on, but every time you turn them on, you increase the chances that next time they will not work.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141854%2fhow-to-preserve-electronics-computers-ipads-phones-for-hundreds-of-years%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    The 5 major things that can degrade electronics are electromagnetism, corrosion, excessive temperatures, vibration, and impact.



    Electromagnetism is your number-one risk. It only takes a static shock with 1/2 the amperage it requires to make a visible spark to damage data; also, background EM radiation can degrade data slowly over time. Forensics investigators will often mitigate this risk by putting evidence into a static resistant evidence bag, which can then be placed in a faraday bag escentially blocking out all external EM influence.



    The second risk is corrosion. For a device that you are not regularly handling, the only major outside corrosive agent you need to worry about is humidity. An air-tight evidence bag also works well for protecting against this; however, an off the shelf evidence bag may not be rated for 500 years. You would likely need to consult with a polymers expert to design such a bag. Vacuum sealing the bag might be worthwhile, but probably not necessary since the small amount of water vapor locked in the bag will expend itself over time doing negligible corrosion. Batteries (as other answers have pointed out) introduce corrosive elements from within; so, they will need to be drained, stored separately, and possibly rebuilt prior to use.



    Excessive heat and cold become the hardest part to control over a 500 year gap. You can not exactly rely on an air conditioning system to be maintained for that long, but if you were to store your device in an underground bunker at a depth of at least 30 feet, mother nature will keep your temperature more or less constant for you.



    Vibration mostly just affects things with moving disk drives in them; so, for purposes of preservation, I'm assuming you are talking about stored and not actively used hardware; so, this should be a minimal issue. That said, if you are occasionally powering your device on, it is best to do so on a heavy well secured desk or shelf. Lighter desks/shelves can be vibrated by a computer's fans reducing a computer drive's expected life-time by up to 75%.



    Last is impact. If you are storing this device in a room full of engineers going about their daily businesses, eventually someone will knock it off the shelf and break it; so, storing it in a place with very limited human access is also pretty important. This makes keeping an electronic device from breaking within 500 years almost impossible for something that you need to use, but if you're talking about purely storage, you should be able to do this and the above 4 steps and have a pretty good success rate at storing electronics for that long.



    In response to Edit #1:



    If you are talking about a museum scenario, the mostly likely case would be to copy the data onto a replica, then put the replica on display. Museums rarely put items that fragile and rare on display.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    The 5 major things that can degrade electronics are electromagnetism, corrosion, excessive temperatures, vibration, and impact.



    Electromagnetism is your number-one risk. It only takes a static shock with 1/2 the amperage it requires to make a visible spark to damage data; also, background EM radiation can degrade data slowly over time. Forensics investigators will often mitigate this risk by putting evidence into a static resistant evidence bag, which can then be placed in a faraday bag escentially blocking out all external EM influence.



    The second risk is corrosion. For a device that you are not regularly handling, the only major outside corrosive agent you need to worry about is humidity. An air-tight evidence bag also works well for protecting against this; however, an off the shelf evidence bag may not be rated for 500 years. You would likely need to consult with a polymers expert to design such a bag. Vacuum sealing the bag might be worthwhile, but probably not necessary since the small amount of water vapor locked in the bag will expend itself over time doing negligible corrosion. Batteries (as other answers have pointed out) introduce corrosive elements from within; so, they will need to be drained, stored separately, and possibly rebuilt prior to use.



    Excessive heat and cold become the hardest part to control over a 500 year gap. You can not exactly rely on an air conditioning system to be maintained for that long, but if you were to store your device in an underground bunker at a depth of at least 30 feet, mother nature will keep your temperature more or less constant for you.



    Vibration mostly just affects things with moving disk drives in them; so, for purposes of preservation, I'm assuming you are talking about stored and not actively used hardware; so, this should be a minimal issue. That said, if you are occasionally powering your device on, it is best to do so on a heavy well secured desk or shelf. Lighter desks/shelves can be vibrated by a computer's fans reducing a computer drive's expected life-time by up to 75%.



    Last is impact. If you are storing this device in a room full of engineers going about their daily businesses, eventually someone will knock it off the shelf and break it; so, storing it in a place with very limited human access is also pretty important. This makes keeping an electronic device from breaking within 500 years almost impossible for something that you need to use, but if you're talking about purely storage, you should be able to do this and the above 4 steps and have a pretty good success rate at storing electronics for that long.



    In response to Edit #1:



    If you are talking about a museum scenario, the mostly likely case would be to copy the data onto a replica, then put the replica on display. Museums rarely put items that fragile and rare on display.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    The 5 major things that can degrade electronics are electromagnetism, corrosion, excessive temperatures, vibration, and impact.



    Electromagnetism is your number-one risk. It only takes a static shock with 1/2 the amperage it requires to make a visible spark to damage data; also, background EM radiation can degrade data slowly over time. Forensics investigators will often mitigate this risk by putting evidence into a static resistant evidence bag, which can then be placed in a faraday bag escentially blocking out all external EM influence.



    The second risk is corrosion. For a device that you are not regularly handling, the only major outside corrosive agent you need to worry about is humidity. An air-tight evidence bag also works well for protecting against this; however, an off the shelf evidence bag may not be rated for 500 years. You would likely need to consult with a polymers expert to design such a bag. Vacuum sealing the bag might be worthwhile, but probably not necessary since the small amount of water vapor locked in the bag will expend itself over time doing negligible corrosion. Batteries (as other answers have pointed out) introduce corrosive elements from within; so, they will need to be drained, stored separately, and possibly rebuilt prior to use.



    Excessive heat and cold become the hardest part to control over a 500 year gap. You can not exactly rely on an air conditioning system to be maintained for that long, but if you were to store your device in an underground bunker at a depth of at least 30 feet, mother nature will keep your temperature more or less constant for you.



    Vibration mostly just affects things with moving disk drives in them; so, for purposes of preservation, I'm assuming you are talking about stored and not actively used hardware; so, this should be a minimal issue. That said, if you are occasionally powering your device on, it is best to do so on a heavy well secured desk or shelf. Lighter desks/shelves can be vibrated by a computer's fans reducing a computer drive's expected life-time by up to 75%.



    Last is impact. If you are storing this device in a room full of engineers going about their daily businesses, eventually someone will knock it off the shelf and break it; so, storing it in a place with very limited human access is also pretty important. This makes keeping an electronic device from breaking within 500 years almost impossible for something that you need to use, but if you're talking about purely storage, you should be able to do this and the above 4 steps and have a pretty good success rate at storing electronics for that long.



    In response to Edit #1:



    If you are talking about a museum scenario, the mostly likely case would be to copy the data onto a replica, then put the replica on display. Museums rarely put items that fragile and rare on display.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The 5 major things that can degrade electronics are electromagnetism, corrosion, excessive temperatures, vibration, and impact.



    Electromagnetism is your number-one risk. It only takes a static shock with 1/2 the amperage it requires to make a visible spark to damage data; also, background EM radiation can degrade data slowly over time. Forensics investigators will often mitigate this risk by putting evidence into a static resistant evidence bag, which can then be placed in a faraday bag escentially blocking out all external EM influence.



    The second risk is corrosion. For a device that you are not regularly handling, the only major outside corrosive agent you need to worry about is humidity. An air-tight evidence bag also works well for protecting against this; however, an off the shelf evidence bag may not be rated for 500 years. You would likely need to consult with a polymers expert to design such a bag. Vacuum sealing the bag might be worthwhile, but probably not necessary since the small amount of water vapor locked in the bag will expend itself over time doing negligible corrosion. Batteries (as other answers have pointed out) introduce corrosive elements from within; so, they will need to be drained, stored separately, and possibly rebuilt prior to use.



    Excessive heat and cold become the hardest part to control over a 500 year gap. You can not exactly rely on an air conditioning system to be maintained for that long, but if you were to store your device in an underground bunker at a depth of at least 30 feet, mother nature will keep your temperature more or less constant for you.



    Vibration mostly just affects things with moving disk drives in them; so, for purposes of preservation, I'm assuming you are talking about stored and not actively used hardware; so, this should be a minimal issue. That said, if you are occasionally powering your device on, it is best to do so on a heavy well secured desk or shelf. Lighter desks/shelves can be vibrated by a computer's fans reducing a computer drive's expected life-time by up to 75%.



    Last is impact. If you are storing this device in a room full of engineers going about their daily businesses, eventually someone will knock it off the shelf and break it; so, storing it in a place with very limited human access is also pretty important. This makes keeping an electronic device from breaking within 500 years almost impossible for something that you need to use, but if you're talking about purely storage, you should be able to do this and the above 4 steps and have a pretty good success rate at storing electronics for that long.



    In response to Edit #1:



    If you are talking about a museum scenario, the mostly likely case would be to copy the data onto a replica, then put the replica on display. Museums rarely put items that fragile and rare on display.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    NosajimikiNosajimiki

    2,172116




    2,172116











    • $begingroup$
      You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You cannot combat dopant and metal diffusion. Modern processors, flash memory and RAM are made up of very many very tiny electronic devices. Semiconductor and metal-oxide junction will degrade over five centuries, no matter what you do. Modern electronic devices are simply not made to last centuries.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    TL;DR You cannot.



    You need purpose-built items, with specially designed components and maybe even ad hoc designs (PSUs without electrolytic capacitors, etc.), capable of withstanding extreme cold.



    Otherwise, there are several chemo-physical processes that would require to be halted.



    • Batteries: batteries will degrade over time, and be the first to go. You might want to store the specifications for the required voltage and just hook up a new battery whenever needed.

    • Static memories and hard disks: temperature, background radiation and charge loss are all enemies. You can cool down the apparatuses as far as possible, and shield them. Even so, they'll need to be reactivated and "refreshed" periodically. This is, on a longer timescale, what happens orders of magnitude times faster with DRAMs. Otherwise, the iPad won't boot up, because it no longer remembers how.

    • Welds. Most electronics being built today will die within fifty years at ambient temperature and pressure, due to the little-known fact that solder islands on circuit boards no longer contain lead or antimony, two poisonous metals that are nonetheless among the few cheap things that can prevent (rather, delay) the formation of metal whiskers. Nickel or gold-plated finishings aren't available on market electronics (some sailors might be familiar with the "brass fluff" growing out of cheap zinc-plated irons. On a much smaller scale, this is the same thing).

    • Condenser decay. This afflicts electrolytic capacitors, due to aluminum dioxide breakdown. Extreme cold will delay this process as well as it delays whiskering, but only up to a point - and some components cannot take extreme cold.

    • Insulator decay. Several rubbers and plastic insulating compounds are mixed with volatile plasticizers, where "volatile" means that they won't evaporate or significantly run off in fifty or sixty years... but the risk is there and I wouldn't bet on their seeing their hundredth birthday.

    Most components aren't engineered to last at all, because the manufacturers know that the items will be replaced anyway inside, at most, of ten years. Just like ol' Henry Ford, who was said to send forensic teams in junkyards to tell him which parts of his cars had not failed so that he could start manufacturing them with cheaper tolerances. Only, this "controlled obsolescence" makes good business sense, and is actually done.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
      $endgroup$
      – farmersteve
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
      $endgroup$
      – LSerni
      1 min ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    TL;DR You cannot.



    You need purpose-built items, with specially designed components and maybe even ad hoc designs (PSUs without electrolytic capacitors, etc.), capable of withstanding extreme cold.



    Otherwise, there are several chemo-physical processes that would require to be halted.



    • Batteries: batteries will degrade over time, and be the first to go. You might want to store the specifications for the required voltage and just hook up a new battery whenever needed.

    • Static memories and hard disks: temperature, background radiation and charge loss are all enemies. You can cool down the apparatuses as far as possible, and shield them. Even so, they'll need to be reactivated and "refreshed" periodically. This is, on a longer timescale, what happens orders of magnitude times faster with DRAMs. Otherwise, the iPad won't boot up, because it no longer remembers how.

    • Welds. Most electronics being built today will die within fifty years at ambient temperature and pressure, due to the little-known fact that solder islands on circuit boards no longer contain lead or antimony, two poisonous metals that are nonetheless among the few cheap things that can prevent (rather, delay) the formation of metal whiskers. Nickel or gold-plated finishings aren't available on market electronics (some sailors might be familiar with the "brass fluff" growing out of cheap zinc-plated irons. On a much smaller scale, this is the same thing).

    • Condenser decay. This afflicts electrolytic capacitors, due to aluminum dioxide breakdown. Extreme cold will delay this process as well as it delays whiskering, but only up to a point - and some components cannot take extreme cold.

    • Insulator decay. Several rubbers and plastic insulating compounds are mixed with volatile plasticizers, where "volatile" means that they won't evaporate or significantly run off in fifty or sixty years... but the risk is there and I wouldn't bet on their seeing their hundredth birthday.

    Most components aren't engineered to last at all, because the manufacturers know that the items will be replaced anyway inside, at most, of ten years. Just like ol' Henry Ford, who was said to send forensic teams in junkyards to tell him which parts of his cars had not failed so that he could start manufacturing them with cheaper tolerances. Only, this "controlled obsolescence" makes good business sense, and is actually done.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
      $endgroup$
      – farmersteve
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
      $endgroup$
      – LSerni
      1 min ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    TL;DR You cannot.



    You need purpose-built items, with specially designed components and maybe even ad hoc designs (PSUs without electrolytic capacitors, etc.), capable of withstanding extreme cold.



    Otherwise, there are several chemo-physical processes that would require to be halted.



    • Batteries: batteries will degrade over time, and be the first to go. You might want to store the specifications for the required voltage and just hook up a new battery whenever needed.

    • Static memories and hard disks: temperature, background radiation and charge loss are all enemies. You can cool down the apparatuses as far as possible, and shield them. Even so, they'll need to be reactivated and "refreshed" periodically. This is, on a longer timescale, what happens orders of magnitude times faster with DRAMs. Otherwise, the iPad won't boot up, because it no longer remembers how.

    • Welds. Most electronics being built today will die within fifty years at ambient temperature and pressure, due to the little-known fact that solder islands on circuit boards no longer contain lead or antimony, two poisonous metals that are nonetheless among the few cheap things that can prevent (rather, delay) the formation of metal whiskers. Nickel or gold-plated finishings aren't available on market electronics (some sailors might be familiar with the "brass fluff" growing out of cheap zinc-plated irons. On a much smaller scale, this is the same thing).

    • Condenser decay. This afflicts electrolytic capacitors, due to aluminum dioxide breakdown. Extreme cold will delay this process as well as it delays whiskering, but only up to a point - and some components cannot take extreme cold.

    • Insulator decay. Several rubbers and plastic insulating compounds are mixed with volatile plasticizers, where "volatile" means that they won't evaporate or significantly run off in fifty or sixty years... but the risk is there and I wouldn't bet on their seeing their hundredth birthday.

    Most components aren't engineered to last at all, because the manufacturers know that the items will be replaced anyway inside, at most, of ten years. Just like ol' Henry Ford, who was said to send forensic teams in junkyards to tell him which parts of his cars had not failed so that he could start manufacturing them with cheaper tolerances. Only, this "controlled obsolescence" makes good business sense, and is actually done.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    TL;DR You cannot.



    You need purpose-built items, with specially designed components and maybe even ad hoc designs (PSUs without electrolytic capacitors, etc.), capable of withstanding extreme cold.



    Otherwise, there are several chemo-physical processes that would require to be halted.



    • Batteries: batteries will degrade over time, and be the first to go. You might want to store the specifications for the required voltage and just hook up a new battery whenever needed.

    • Static memories and hard disks: temperature, background radiation and charge loss are all enemies. You can cool down the apparatuses as far as possible, and shield them. Even so, they'll need to be reactivated and "refreshed" periodically. This is, on a longer timescale, what happens orders of magnitude times faster with DRAMs. Otherwise, the iPad won't boot up, because it no longer remembers how.

    • Welds. Most electronics being built today will die within fifty years at ambient temperature and pressure, due to the little-known fact that solder islands on circuit boards no longer contain lead or antimony, two poisonous metals that are nonetheless among the few cheap things that can prevent (rather, delay) the formation of metal whiskers. Nickel or gold-plated finishings aren't available on market electronics (some sailors might be familiar with the "brass fluff" growing out of cheap zinc-plated irons. On a much smaller scale, this is the same thing).

    • Condenser decay. This afflicts electrolytic capacitors, due to aluminum dioxide breakdown. Extreme cold will delay this process as well as it delays whiskering, but only up to a point - and some components cannot take extreme cold.

    • Insulator decay. Several rubbers and plastic insulating compounds are mixed with volatile plasticizers, where "volatile" means that they won't evaporate or significantly run off in fifty or sixty years... but the risk is there and I wouldn't bet on their seeing their hundredth birthday.

    Most components aren't engineered to last at all, because the manufacturers know that the items will be replaced anyway inside, at most, of ten years. Just like ol' Henry Ford, who was said to send forensic teams in junkyards to tell him which parts of his cars had not failed so that he could start manufacturing them with cheaper tolerances. Only, this "controlled obsolescence" makes good business sense, and is actually done.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    LSerniLSerni

    28.7k25192




    28.7k25192











    • $begingroup$
      This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
      $endgroup$
      – farmersteve
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
      $endgroup$
      – LSerni
      1 min ago
















    • $begingroup$
      This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
      $endgroup$
      – farmersteve
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
      $endgroup$
      – LSerni
      1 min ago















    $begingroup$
    This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    40 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    This is what I figured. Consumer electronics are not meant to last any meaningful amount of time. BUT, if someone (company/government) wanted to make something that lasted a very long time, they could.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    40 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 min ago




    $begingroup$
    @farmersteve absolutely. Military-grade hardware already is way sturdier (and more expensive) than average. They, too, do not care for overlong stand-alone endurance (they make do with spare parts). But it can be done and in some instances is being done (e.g. NASA-spec electronics can be stored in extreme cold and hard vacuum, and are much more radiation resistant. Just look at some Martian rovers....).
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 min ago











    2












    $begingroup$

    If powered down, electronics can last as long as they don't take physical harm, with the exception of batteries and the bearings in moving parts like fans or platter hard drives.



    Batteries, sad to say, can't be made to last that long -- or at least the kind that are useful for portable devices like tablets,. notebooks, and smart phones. There's a type of rechargeable battery that has been shown to last a century, and can likely last much longer than that -- the Edison iron battery -- but they have rather poor energy density. In English, that means a battery that can run a tablet for four or five hours continuously is closer in size to a car battery than the little lithium wafer cells our tablets have now.



    Nothing would keep those devices from working on external power, however, so it might be worth storing dry-charged lead-acid batteries, which can last indefinitely before filling with acid.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
      $endgroup$
      – GOATNine
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      3 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago















    2












    $begingroup$

    If powered down, electronics can last as long as they don't take physical harm, with the exception of batteries and the bearings in moving parts like fans or platter hard drives.



    Batteries, sad to say, can't be made to last that long -- or at least the kind that are useful for portable devices like tablets,. notebooks, and smart phones. There's a type of rechargeable battery that has been shown to last a century, and can likely last much longer than that -- the Edison iron battery -- but they have rather poor energy density. In English, that means a battery that can run a tablet for four or five hours continuously is closer in size to a car battery than the little lithium wafer cells our tablets have now.



    Nothing would keep those devices from working on external power, however, so it might be worth storing dry-charged lead-acid batteries, which can last indefinitely before filling with acid.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
      $endgroup$
      – GOATNine
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      3 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    If powered down, electronics can last as long as they don't take physical harm, with the exception of batteries and the bearings in moving parts like fans or platter hard drives.



    Batteries, sad to say, can't be made to last that long -- or at least the kind that are useful for portable devices like tablets,. notebooks, and smart phones. There's a type of rechargeable battery that has been shown to last a century, and can likely last much longer than that -- the Edison iron battery -- but they have rather poor energy density. In English, that means a battery that can run a tablet for four or five hours continuously is closer in size to a car battery than the little lithium wafer cells our tablets have now.



    Nothing would keep those devices from working on external power, however, so it might be worth storing dry-charged lead-acid batteries, which can last indefinitely before filling with acid.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    If powered down, electronics can last as long as they don't take physical harm, with the exception of batteries and the bearings in moving parts like fans or platter hard drives.



    Batteries, sad to say, can't be made to last that long -- or at least the kind that are useful for portable devices like tablets,. notebooks, and smart phones. There's a type of rechargeable battery that has been shown to last a century, and can likely last much longer than that -- the Edison iron battery -- but they have rather poor energy density. In English, that means a battery that can run a tablet for four or five hours continuously is closer in size to a car battery than the little lithium wafer cells our tablets have now.



    Nothing would keep those devices from working on external power, however, so it might be worth storing dry-charged lead-acid batteries, which can last indefinitely before filling with acid.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 4 hours ago









    Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

    1,858115




    1,858115











    • $begingroup$
      Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
      $endgroup$
      – GOATNine
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      3 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
      $endgroup$
      – GOATNine
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      3 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      3 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
    $endgroup$
    – GOATNine
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Capacitors and Resistors also degrade when not in use, and present day commercial capacitors likely won't last a century.
    $endgroup$
    – GOATNine
    4 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @GOATNine That's true of electrolytics, for certain, but as far as I know not for ceramic, tantalum, or similar solid-state capacitors. There are few if any electrolytics on the surface-mount circuit boards of a modern phone or tablet. I don't know of a mechanism whereby SMD resistors can deteriorate when not powered.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    3 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    That is a good point in normal storage scenarios, but Capacitors and Resistors degrade due to corrosion and temperature. If you store them in a cool, dry, sealed system, they should only corrode to the point that the environment has contaminates to degrade them with extending their life indefinitely to the point of how well you sealed them.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    3 hours ago





    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Nosajimiki Argon purge and constant-temp storage at cool room temp should do it. Might require an archival disassembly and cleaning to ensure there's no (for instance) solder flux left in the device to provide those contaminants.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    3 hours ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    In all honesty, electronics are incredibly difficult to preserve, due to the very nature of their components.



    Particularly, batteries have a defined shelf life, even when unused. Capacitors and resistors (key components in most electronics) also have a limited lifespan, though they may degrade much more slowly if not in use. Storage media (such as flash memory or hard disks) have a limited life cycle related to the number of read/write operations performed. To have the electronics active, even just displaying a static screen, would likely severely limit the lifespan of any electronic device.



    The solution for museum displays would necessarily be restoration/periodic repair. There would have to exist a manufacturing process to produce replacement parts for the duration of the displays existence in the museum.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
      $endgroup$
      – Shalvenay
      12 mins ago















    1












    $begingroup$

    In all honesty, electronics are incredibly difficult to preserve, due to the very nature of their components.



    Particularly, batteries have a defined shelf life, even when unused. Capacitors and resistors (key components in most electronics) also have a limited lifespan, though they may degrade much more slowly if not in use. Storage media (such as flash memory or hard disks) have a limited life cycle related to the number of read/write operations performed. To have the electronics active, even just displaying a static screen, would likely severely limit the lifespan of any electronic device.



    The solution for museum displays would necessarily be restoration/periodic repair. There would have to exist a manufacturing process to produce replacement parts for the duration of the displays existence in the museum.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
      $endgroup$
      – Shalvenay
      12 mins ago













    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    In all honesty, electronics are incredibly difficult to preserve, due to the very nature of their components.



    Particularly, batteries have a defined shelf life, even when unused. Capacitors and resistors (key components in most electronics) also have a limited lifespan, though they may degrade much more slowly if not in use. Storage media (such as flash memory or hard disks) have a limited life cycle related to the number of read/write operations performed. To have the electronics active, even just displaying a static screen, would likely severely limit the lifespan of any electronic device.



    The solution for museum displays would necessarily be restoration/periodic repair. There would have to exist a manufacturing process to produce replacement parts for the duration of the displays existence in the museum.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    In all honesty, electronics are incredibly difficult to preserve, due to the very nature of their components.



    Particularly, batteries have a defined shelf life, even when unused. Capacitors and resistors (key components in most electronics) also have a limited lifespan, though they may degrade much more slowly if not in use. Storage media (such as flash memory or hard disks) have a limited life cycle related to the number of read/write operations performed. To have the electronics active, even just displaying a static screen, would likely severely limit the lifespan of any electronic device.



    The solution for museum displays would necessarily be restoration/periodic repair. There would have to exist a manufacturing process to produce replacement parts for the duration of the displays existence in the museum.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 4 hours ago









    GOATNineGOATNine

    812213




    812213











    • $begingroup$
      Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
      $endgroup$
      – Shalvenay
      12 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
      $endgroup$
      – Shalvenay
      12 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    12 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Resistors aren't usually a life-limited part. Electrolytic capacitors, though, definitely are!
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    12 mins ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Preserving electronics for 500 years in working order dictates that they not be used at all in that 500 years.



    Copper, in particular, gets brittle as current passes through it and it heats up, and the copper traces in circuit boards even more so. The resistance of the copper joints also goes up.



    Electromigration is also a problem.



    Unfortunately, the only way you will know if they still work is to turn them on, but every time you turn them on, you increase the chances that next time they will not work.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Preserving electronics for 500 years in working order dictates that they not be used at all in that 500 years.



      Copper, in particular, gets brittle as current passes through it and it heats up, and the copper traces in circuit boards even more so. The resistance of the copper joints also goes up.



      Electromigration is also a problem.



      Unfortunately, the only way you will know if they still work is to turn them on, but every time you turn them on, you increase the chances that next time they will not work.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Preserving electronics for 500 years in working order dictates that they not be used at all in that 500 years.



        Copper, in particular, gets brittle as current passes through it and it heats up, and the copper traces in circuit boards even more so. The resistance of the copper joints also goes up.



        Electromigration is also a problem.



        Unfortunately, the only way you will know if they still work is to turn them on, but every time you turn them on, you increase the chances that next time they will not work.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Preserving electronics for 500 years in working order dictates that they not be used at all in that 500 years.



        Copper, in particular, gets brittle as current passes through it and it heats up, and the copper traces in circuit boards even more so. The resistance of the copper joints also goes up.



        Electromigration is also a problem.



        Unfortunately, the only way you will know if they still work is to turn them on, but every time you turn them on, you increase the chances that next time they will not work.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Justin Thyme the SecondJustin Thyme the Second

        7757




        7757



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141854%2fhow-to-preserve-electronics-computers-ipads-phones-for-hundreds-of-years%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?How is it wrong to believe that a self exists, or that it doesn't?Can you criticise or improve Ven. Bodhi's description of MahayanaWas the doctrine of 'Anatta', accepted as doctrine by modern Buddhism, actually taught by the Buddha?Relationship between Buddhism, Hinduism and Yoga?Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/AtmaIs there a distinction between “ego identity” and “craving/hating”?Are there many differences between Taoism and Buddhism?Loss of “faith” in buddhismSimilarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?Are there studies about the difference between meditating in the morning versus in the evening?Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?Are there any prohibitions on participating in other religion's practices?Psychology of 'flow'

            fallocate: fallocate failed: Text file busy in Ubuntu 17.04? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)defragmenting and increasing performance of old lubuntu system with swap partitionIssue with increasing the root partition from the swapthis /usr/bin/dpkg returned error || ubuntu-16.04, 64bitDefault 17.04 swap file locationHow to Resize Ubuntu 17.04 Zesty Swap file size?Ubuntu freezes from online formsMy Laptop is not starting after upgrade ubuntu 16.04 (Kernel 4.8.0-38 to 04.10.0-36)hcp: ERROR: FALLOCATE FAILED!Not sure my swap is being usedWine 3.0 asking for more virtual free swap

            Where is the suspend/hibernate button in GNOME Shell? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)No suspend option in UI on Bionic BeaverHow can I set sleep mode in ubuntu18.04 LTS and what is the short cut key to do so?17.10 suspend not availableUbuntu 18.04 LTS missing sleep optionUbuntu 18.04 LTS - missing suspend option when power button is pressedHow to put Thinkpad X1 Extreme to sleep in Ubuntu 18.10?Suspend Button in interactive power button menu18.04 - Keep programs running after logging outway to disable Hibernate from within gconf-editor so button disappears?How can I hibernate from GNOME Shell?How can I hibernate/suspend from the command line and do so at a specific timeNo permission to suspend/hibernate after upgrading to 12.10MATE - Missing Suspend and Hibernate buttons, pressing power button shutdowns system immediatelyUbuntu 14.04: Suspend, Hibernate and Suspend-hybrid in the menu?Change “power-button-action” comand for “hibernate” option in GNOME 3.18Shutdown / Power off button does always go to suspend on 17.10Hibernate after suspend stopped working in 17.10Why doesn't the keyboard screenshot button work on Ubuntu with GNOME shell?