Variety of conjugacy classesConjugacy classes in Aut(G)When does dimension behave nicely for quotients of affine algebraic varieties by the action of a group?Reconciling Lusztig's results with the Langlands philosophyEarliest use of the term “linearly reductive”?Homogeneous spaces of affine algebraic groupsConjugacy scheme, fppf versus GITWhy is Mumford's GIT-quotient so effective?variations of finite stabilizer in the action of an algebraic group on an affine varietyUniqueness of the wonderful compactification of a semi-simple groupSplitting of regular semisimple conjugacy classes in $SL_n(q)$
Variety of conjugacy classes
Conjugacy classes in Aut(G)When does dimension behave nicely for quotients of affine algebraic varieties by the action of a group?Reconciling Lusztig's results with the Langlands philosophyEarliest use of the term “linearly reductive”?Homogeneous spaces of affine algebraic groupsConjugacy scheme, fppf versus GITWhy is Mumford's GIT-quotient so effective?variations of finite stabilizer in the action of an algebraic group on an affine varietyUniqueness of the wonderful compactification of a semi-simple groupSplitting of regular semisimple conjugacy classes in $SL_n(q)$
$begingroup$
Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)
Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.
ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)
Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.
ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)
Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.
ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes
$endgroup$
Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)
Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.
ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes
ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes
edited 8 hours ago
YCor
28.2k483136
28.2k483136
asked 8 hours ago
mnrmnr
636315
636315
1
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.
The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.
Here is a proof:
For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$
In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).
However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.
And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.
Examples:
$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$
$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325195%2fvariety-of-conjugacy-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.
The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.
The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.
The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.
$endgroup$
What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.
The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
ThiKuThiKu
6,30512137
6,30512137
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
$endgroup$
– YCor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
$endgroup$
– ThiKu
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.
Here is a proof:
For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$
In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).
However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.
And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.
Examples:
$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$
$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.
Here is a proof:
For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$
In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).
However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.
And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.
Examples:
$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$
$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.
Here is a proof:
For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$
In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).
However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.
And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.
Examples:
$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$
$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $
$endgroup$
As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.
Here is a proof:
For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$
In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).
However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.
And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.
Examples:
$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$
$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
Sean LawtonSean Lawton
3,38122142
3,38122142
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325195%2fvariety-of-conjugacy-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago