Variety of conjugacy classesConjugacy classes in Aut(G)When does dimension behave nicely for quotients of affine algebraic varieties by the action of a group?Reconciling Lusztig's results with the Langlands philosophyEarliest use of the term “linearly reductive”?Homogeneous spaces of affine algebraic groupsConjugacy scheme, fppf versus GITWhy is Mumford's GIT-quotient so effective?variations of finite stabilizer in the action of an algebraic group on an affine varietyUniqueness of the wonderful compactification of a semi-simple groupSplitting of regular semisimple conjugacy classes in $SL_n(q)$

Variety of conjugacy classes


Conjugacy classes in Aut(G)When does dimension behave nicely for quotients of affine algebraic varieties by the action of a group?Reconciling Lusztig's results with the Langlands philosophyEarliest use of the term “linearly reductive”?Homogeneous spaces of affine algebraic groupsConjugacy scheme, fppf versus GITWhy is Mumford's GIT-quotient so effective?variations of finite stabilizer in the action of an algebraic group on an affine varietyUniqueness of the wonderful compactification of a semi-simple groupSplitting of regular semisimple conjugacy classes in $SL_n(q)$













2












$begingroup$


Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)



Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    8 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)



Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    8 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)



Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider a reductive group $G$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $0$. I would like to consider the space $X$ of all $G$-conjugacy classes in $G$. Does the space $X$ have some nice geometric structure? (For instance, is it a variety? And/or if I take $K = mathbbC$ is the space $X(mathbbC)$ Hausdorff? (It seems not to me, but I would like to ask)



Beware: I have not included the condition that I look at semi-simple conjugacy classes.







ag.algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups invariant-theory reductive-groups conjugacy-classes






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









YCor

28.2k483136




28.2k483136










asked 8 hours ago









mnrmnr

636315




636315







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    8 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
    $endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    8 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
The spectrum of the $K$-subalgebra of invariants of $k[G]$ for the conjugation action is canonically isomorphic to the (finite) quotient of a maximal torus $T$ by the induced conjugation action of the Weyl group $W(G,T):=N_G(T)/T$. For the induced quotient map $q:Gto W/T$, every fiber of a regular element equals the corresponding conjugacy class. Some fibers contain many conjugacy classes. My recollection is that every fiber contains a unique conjugacy class of semisimple elements.
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
The topological quotient is Hausdorff if and only if $G$ is Abelian (i.e., multiplicative). The map from the topological quotent to $W/T$ should be the initial continuous map to a Hausdorff topological space (when $K$ equals $mathbbC$).
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
8 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
A single example such as $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ shows that the quotient by conjugacy is not Hausdorff. What have you tried?
$endgroup$
– YCor
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.



The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
$$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – ThiKu
    6 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.



Here is a proof:



For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$



In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).



However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.



And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.



Examples:



$SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$



$SU(3)/SU(3)cong $



SU(3)/SU(3)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325195%2fvariety-of-conjugacy-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.



    The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
    $$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
    It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
      $endgroup$
      – YCor
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – ThiKu
      6 hours ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.



    The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
    $$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
    It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
      $endgroup$
      – YCor
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – ThiKu
      6 hours ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.



    The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
    $$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
    It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    What you look it at is exactly the quotient of the representation variety $$Hom(mathbf Z,G)$$ of representations from the integers $mathbf Z$ to $G$, by the $G$-action via conjugation.



    The quotient of the representation variety is in general not a variety, however you can look at the GIT-quotient, which is the character variety
    $$X(mathbf Z,G)=Hom(mathbf Z,G)//G.$$
    It is the Hausdorffification of the actual quotient. In the case $G=GL(n,mathbf C)$ it is constructed by identifying two representations when all their traces agree. In your case this just means that you identify matrices if the traces of all their powers agree.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 6 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    ThiKuThiKu

    6,30512137




    6,30512137







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
      $endgroup$
      – YCor
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – ThiKu
      6 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
      $endgroup$
      – YCor
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – ThiKu
      6 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Your last sentence is only true for $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$. In general, you maybe mean the characteristic polynomial in lieu of traces.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – ThiKu
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Right, you need the traces of all $A^n$, not only the trace of $A$. I will correct this in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – ThiKu
    6 hours ago











    2












    $begingroup$

    As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.



    Here is a proof:



    For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$



    In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).



    However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.



    And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.



    Examples:



    $SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$



    $SU(3)/SU(3)cong $



    SU(3)/SU(3)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.



      Here is a proof:



      For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$



      In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).



      However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.



      And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.



      Examples:



      $SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$



      $SU(3)/SU(3)cong $



      SU(3)/SU(3)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.



        Here is a proof:



        For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$



        In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).



        However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.



        And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.



        Examples:



        $SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$



        $SU(3)/SU(3)cong $



        SU(3)/SU(3)






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As already noted, the quotient need not be even $T_1$. For example, $SL_2(mathbbC)/SL_2(mathbbC)$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbC$ with double points at $pm 2$. This quotient is not $T_1$ since two of those points are not closed.



        Here is a proof:



        For any $tin mathbbC$, define $epsilon_t:=left(beginarraycct&-1\1&0endarrayright)$. Take any $Ain SL_2(mathbbC)$ so that its trace is not equal to $pm 2.$ Then it has two distinct eigenvalues determined by its trace (use the quadratic formula on the characteristic polynomial to see this). Consequently, there is a matrix $g_A$ such that $g_A A g_A^-1=epsilon_t$. Consequently, each of these conjugation orbits is closed. If its trace is $pm 2$, then $A$ is either conjugate to $epsilon_t$ or equals $pmmathbf1$. In the former case, $epsilon_t$ is conjugate to one of $left(beginarrayccpm 1& 1\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Conjugating by $left(beginarrayccn&0\0&frac1nendarrayright)$ then gives $left(beginarrayccpm 1& frac1n^2\ 0& pm 1endarrayright)$. Letting $nto infty$ we see that $pm mathbf1$ is in the closure of the orbit of $epsilon_t$. $Box$



        In general, $G/G$ will not be ``nice'' for complex reductive groups $G$ (unless $G$ is abelian).



        However, $G/G$, in this generality, is homotopic to the GIT quotient $G/!!/Gcong T/W$, where $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $W$ is the Weyl group. And in turn $G/!!/G$ is homotopic to the corresponding quotient $K/K$ for a maximal compact $K$ in $G$.



        And, if $K$ is simply connected, its Weyl alcove is homeomorphic to $K/K$. Therefore, $K/K$ is homeomophic to a closed ball in this case.



        Examples:



        $SU(2)/SU(2)cong [-2,2]$



        $SU(3)/SU(3)cong $



        SU(3)/SU(3)







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Sean LawtonSean Lawton

        3,38122142




        3,38122142



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325195%2fvariety-of-conjugacy-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

            Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

            Antonio De Lisio Carrera Referencias Menú de navegación«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«Cuando los gobiernos subestiman a las localidades: L a Iniciativa para la Integración de la Infraestructura Regional Suramericana (IIRSA) en la frontera Colombo-Venezolana»«Maestría en Planificación Integral del Ambiente»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«Conózcanos»«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»