Ttgjyuk

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Superhero words!

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

What was required to accept "troll"?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

Simple recursive Sudoku solver

Latex for-and in equation

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Stereotypical names

Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?

Can a controlled ghast be a leader of a pack of ghouls?

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?

Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?When Silent Image Is Disbelieved, Is It Transparent?Is there a mistake in the shadow illusions example?In the Spell “Guards and Wards” is there a size limit on the doors that can be affected as per the limitations on Minor Illusions?What is the correct Minor Illusion “image of an object” size interpretation?Can a “real” illusion be seen through?How would something passing through an illusion of fog or mist reveal it to be illusory?Does the Major Image spell allow the caster to fill the 20 ft cube with as many “body doubles” as he/she sees fit?If one is sure that he is perceiving an illusion, having not interacted with or investigated it, can he see, hear, etc. through it?Do sounds created by Minor Illusion have to have a single fixed origin point?

21

$begingroup$

The Minor Illusion spell description states:

If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.

(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side (the cube in red in the drawing), i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal (the blue line) is about 7ft long:

Much better drawing thanks to @Sdjz:

Is this "layout" of a cube valid for the Minor Illusion spell?

Note that this could potentially change the argument of the answer to "Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?".

Also related: How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?

dnd-5e spells area-of-effect

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
  $endgroup$
  – David Coffron
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Sdjz yeah, that's exactly what I attempted to draw :D I will include that, I think it will help people visualise it better than my "art".
  $endgroup$
  – Sebas
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I really do love the drawing lol
  $endgroup$
  – Smart_TJ
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

21

$begingroup$

The Minor Illusion spell description states:

If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.

(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side (the cube in red in the drawing), i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal (the blue line) is about 7ft long:

Much better drawing thanks to @Sdjz:

Is this "layout" of a cube valid for the Minor Illusion spell?

Note that this could potentially change the argument of the answer to "Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?".

Also related: How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?

dnd-5e spells area-of-effect

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
  $endgroup$
  – David Coffron
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Sdjz yeah, that's exactly what I attempted to draw :D I will include that, I think it will help people visualise it better than my "art".
  $endgroup$
  – Sebas
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I really do love the drawing lol
  $endgroup$
  – Smart_TJ
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The Minor Illusion spell description states:

If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.

(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side (the cube in red in the drawing), i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal (the blue line) is about 7ft long:

Much better drawing thanks to @Sdjz:

Is this "layout" of a cube valid for the Minor Illusion spell?

Note that this could potentially change the argument of the answer to "Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?".

Also related: How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?

dnd-5e spells area-of-effect

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

New contributor

Sebas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 6 hours ago

SebasSebas

2065

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

18

$begingroup$

Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning

In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:

Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.

While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

The answer is technically yes.

Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in D&D, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.

Good question. I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules; I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Sebas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143902%2fcan-i-create-an-upright-7-foot-%25c3%2597-5-foot-wall-with-the-minor-illusion-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

18

$begingroup$

Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning

In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:

Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.

While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

18

$begingroup$

Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning

In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:

Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.

While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning

In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:

Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.

While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

answered 6 hours ago

RykaraRykara

4,542939

0

$begingroup$

The answer is technically yes.

Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in D&D, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.

Good question. I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules; I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

The answer is technically yes.

Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in D&D, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.

Good question. I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules; I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The answer is technically yes.

Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in D&D, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.

Good question. I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules; I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

edited 2 hours ago

V2Blast

25.6k488158

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719

New contributor

Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

answered 4 hours ago

Smart_TJSmart_TJ

719