Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
Why does Python start at index 1 when iterating an array backwards?
Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics
Best practices for giving outside developer SSH access?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
What are 'alternative tunings' of a guitar and why would you use them? Doesn't it make it more difficult to play?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
The logistics of corpse disposal
Single word antonym of "flightless"
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
How to assign captions for two tables in LaTeX?
What does the "x" in "x86" represent?
Does surprise arrest existing movement?
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
Is high blood pressure ever a symptom attributable solely to dehydration?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
How do I determine if the rules for a long jump or high jump are applicable for Monks?
Did Kevin spill real chili?
I am not a queen, who am I?
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
Examples of mediopassive verb constructions
Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.5k664126
19.5k664126
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
user77021user77021
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
MaxWMaxW
15.7k22261
15.7k22261
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne
6,348725
6,348725
add a comment |
add a comment |
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
9 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
9 hours ago