Natural language into sentence logic The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural language as logically valid as in formal logic?Questions about the relationship between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and TractatusWhere Wittgenstein argues that thinking is done in natural language?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

How can I open an app using Terminal?

What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables

Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Why does C# sound extremely flat when saxophone is tuned to G?

Text adventure game code

How to write the block matrix in LaTex?

Is it safe to use c_str() on a temporary string?

Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

How can I quit an app using Terminal?

When did Lisp start using symbols for arithmetic?

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

Where to find order of arguments for default functions

How to safely derail a train during transit?



Natural language into sentence logic



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural language as logically valid as in formal logic?Questions about the relationship between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and TractatusWhere Wittgenstein argues that thinking is done in natural language?










1















Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



  1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


  2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










share|improve this question


























    1















    Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



    D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



    1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


    2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1


      1






      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










      share|improve this question














      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.







      natural-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      A. DelargeA. Delarge

      513




      513




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            14 mins ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "265"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            14 mins ago















          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            14 mins ago













          3












          3








          3







          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 1 hour ago









          cenicerocenicero

          311




          311




          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.












          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            14 mins ago

















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            14 mins ago
















          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          14 mins ago





          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          14 mins ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Möglingen Índice Localización Historia Demografía Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación48°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.129166666666748°53′18″N 9°07′45″E / 48.888333333333, 9.1291666666667Sitio web oficial Mapa de Möglingen«Gemeinden in Deutschland nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Postleitzahl am 30.09.2016»Möglingen

          Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

          Antonio De Lisio Carrera Referencias Menú de navegación«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«Cuando los gobiernos subestiman a las localidades: L a Iniciativa para la Integración de la Infraestructura Regional Suramericana (IIRSA) en la frontera Colombo-Venezolana»«Maestría en Planificación Integral del Ambiente»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»«Conózcanos»«Caracas: evolución relacional multipleja»«La Metrópoli Caraqueña: Expansión Simplificadora o Articulación Diversificante»