Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th CenturyHow long will it take to form a new dialect and language in underground steampunk London?Could a 19th century space gun be of any use today in space exploration?What would the industrial age be like without oil and coal?What would a steam locomotive look like if steam power became yet again the main type used in rail transportation?Post apocalyptic science based storyCan this world invent gas cylinders early?Designing an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardHow to combat magic as science?Could people of the 14th century create an inline engine for use in aircraft and vehicles?Counteracting Perverse Incentive effects in 1902 Hanoi rat population

Some numbers are more equivalent than others

Is it possible to use .desktop files to open local pdf files on specific pages with a browser?

Create all possible words using a set or letters

How must one send away the mother bird?

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

Could the E-bike drivetrain wear down till needing replacement after 400 km?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

How do I implement a file system driver driver in Linux?

Bob has never been a M before

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?

Do varchar(max), nvarchar(max) and varbinary(max) columns affect select queries?

Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

List of people who lose a child in תנ"ך

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Why we can't differentiate a polynomial equation as many times as we wish?



Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century


How long will it take to form a new dialect and language in underground steampunk London?Could a 19th century space gun be of any use today in space exploration?What would the industrial age be like without oil and coal?What would a steam locomotive look like if steam power became yet again the main type used in rail transportation?Post apocalyptic science based storyCan this world invent gas cylinders early?Designing an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardHow to combat magic as science?Could people of the 14th century create an inline engine for use in aircraft and vehicles?Counteracting Perverse Incentive effects in 1902 Hanoi rat population













2












$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    43 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    31 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    43 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    31 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.







technology hard-science steampunk






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 19 mins ago







Echo61505

















asked 2 hours ago









Echo61505Echo61505

766




766











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    43 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    31 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    43 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    31 mins ago















$begingroup$
Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
$endgroup$
– Raditz_35
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
$endgroup$
– Raditz_35
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
$endgroup$
– Renan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
$endgroup$
– Renan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
43 mins ago




$begingroup$
In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
43 mins ago












$begingroup$
Dann that typo..
$endgroup$
– Echo61505
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
Dann that typo..
$endgroup$
– Echo61505
31 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    44 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142249%2fcould-solar-power-be-utilized-and-substitute-coal-in-the-19th-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    44 mins ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    44 mins ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









cmastercmaster

3,522815




3,522815











  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    44 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    44 mins ago















$begingroup$
Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
44 mins ago




$begingroup$
Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
44 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142249%2fcould-solar-power-be-utilized-and-substitute-coal-in-the-19th-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?How is it wrong to believe that a self exists, or that it doesn't?Can you criticise or improve Ven. Bodhi's description of MahayanaWas the doctrine of 'Anatta', accepted as doctrine by modern Buddhism, actually taught by the Buddha?Relationship between Buddhism, Hinduism and Yoga?Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/AtmaIs there a distinction between “ego identity” and “craving/hating”?Are there many differences between Taoism and Buddhism?Loss of “faith” in buddhismSimilarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?Are there studies about the difference between meditating in the morning versus in the evening?Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?Are there any prohibitions on participating in other religion's practices?Psychology of 'flow'

Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverShulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?Are there practices where Sepharadim do not hold by Shulchan Aruch?5th part of the shulchan aruch

fallocate: fallocate failed: Text file busy in Ubuntu 17.04? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)defragmenting and increasing performance of old lubuntu system with swap partitionIssue with increasing the root partition from the swapthis /usr/bin/dpkg returned error || ubuntu-16.04, 64bitDefault 17.04 swap file locationHow to Resize Ubuntu 17.04 Zesty Swap file size?Ubuntu freezes from online formsMy Laptop is not starting after upgrade ubuntu 16.04 (Kernel 4.8.0-38 to 04.10.0-36)hcp: ERROR: FALLOCATE FAILED!Not sure my swap is being usedWine 3.0 asking for more virtual free swap