Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to increase the font size when printing?Is it possible to change the fontsize and simultaneously TabSpacing when printing a notebook in the working enviromentHow to Print a Cell Landscape in a Portrait Orientation Notebook?How can one programatically change Magnification or select others than offered?Printing problem: PDF output has a plot errorStop notebook from auto-scrolling upon printing

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?

Spanish for "widget"

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?



Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to increase the font size when printing?Is it possible to change the fontsize and simultaneously TabSpacing when printing a notebook in the working enviromentHow to Print a Cell Landscape in a Portrait Orientation Notebook?How can one programatically change Magnification or select others than offered?Printing problem: PDF output has a plot errorStop notebook from auto-scrolling upon printing










2












$begingroup$


The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



    Do[
    Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
    i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


    It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




    the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



    Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



    By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?







      output-formatting number-form






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 26 mins ago









      m_goldberg

      88.4k872199




      88.4k872199










      asked 7 hours ago









      zyyzyy

      1236




      1236




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



          StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



          Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



          The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



          You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



          Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
          N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



          the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



            V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



            Here is how you can get your output with Row.



            Column[
            Table[
            Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


            output



            One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



            numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
            Style[
            Column[
            Table[
            Row[
            "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
            ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
            FontFamily -> "Arial"]


            styled



            It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



              StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



              Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



              The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



              You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



              Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
              N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



              the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                5












                $begingroup$

                This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago

























                  answered 7 hours ago









                  RomanRoman

                  4,91011130




                  4,91011130





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                      V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                      Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                      output



                      One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                      numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                      Style[
                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row[
                      "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                      ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                      FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                      styled



                      It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                        V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                        Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                        output



                        One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                        numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                        Style[
                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row[
                        "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                        ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                        FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                        styled



                        It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 25 mins ago

























                          answered 1 hour ago









                          m_goldbergm_goldberg

                          88.4k872199




                          88.4k872199



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Virtualbox - Configuration error: Querying “UUID” failed (VERR_CFGM_VALUE_NOT_FOUND)“VERR_SUPLIB_WORLD_WRITABLE” error when trying to installing OS in virtualboxVirtual Box Kernel errorFailed to open a seesion for the virtual machineFailed to open a session for the virtual machineUbuntu 14.04 LTS Virtualbox errorcan't use VM VirtualBoxusing virtualboxI can't run Linux-64 Bit on VirtualBoxUnable to insert the virtual optical disk (VBoxguestaddition) in virtual machine for ubuntu server in win 10VirtuaBox in Ubuntu 18.04 Issues with Win10.ISO Installation

                              Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?How is it wrong to believe that a self exists, or that it doesn't?Can you criticise or improve Ven. Bodhi's description of MahayanaWas the doctrine of 'Anatta', accepted as doctrine by modern Buddhism, actually taught by the Buddha?Relationship between Buddhism, Hinduism and Yoga?Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/AtmaIs there a distinction between “ego identity” and “craving/hating”?Are there many differences between Taoism and Buddhism?Loss of “faith” in buddhismSimilarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?Are there studies about the difference between meditating in the morning versus in the evening?Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?Are there any prohibitions on participating in other religion's practices?Psychology of 'flow'

                              Where is the suspend/hibernate button in GNOME Shell? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)No suspend option in UI on Bionic BeaverHow can I set sleep mode in ubuntu18.04 LTS and what is the short cut key to do so?17.10 suspend not availableUbuntu 18.04 LTS missing sleep optionUbuntu 18.04 LTS - missing suspend option when power button is pressedHow to put Thinkpad X1 Extreme to sleep in Ubuntu 18.10?Suspend Button in interactive power button menu18.04 - Keep programs running after logging outway to disable Hibernate from within gconf-editor so button disappears?How can I hibernate from GNOME Shell?How can I hibernate/suspend from the command line and do so at a specific timeNo permission to suspend/hibernate after upgrading to 12.10MATE - Missing Suspend and Hibernate buttons, pressing power button shutdowns system immediatelyUbuntu 14.04: Suspend, Hibernate and Suspend-hybrid in the menu?Change “power-button-action” comand for “hibernate” option in GNOME 3.18Shutdown / Power off button does always go to suspend on 17.10Hibernate after suspend stopped working in 17.10Why doesn't the keyboard screenshot button work on Ubuntu with GNOME shell?