Mounting a new hard drive (sda1) to my existing filesystemWhy when I retrieve the list of partitions it only gives me one result?File system is not clean (The partition is misaligned by 1024 bytes)Unable to mount an LVM Hard-drive after upgradeDeleted Windows Partitions on drive now what do I do?Raid Issues Cannot Boot and Getting Superblock ErrorsCan't remove GPT table from hard driveDrive failure in Raid1. Can't replaceBoot linux on external hard disk - Send Grub RescueHow to configure existing raid after upgrading to 14.04 from 11Intel RAID5 array Shows < 50% space
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?
Short story: alien planet where slow students are executed
Landing in very high winds
COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?
What is it called when one voice type sings a 'solo'?
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
What to wear for invited talk in Canada
Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?
How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors
Finding files for which a command fails
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?
Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?
How to manage monthly salary
LWC and complex parameters
Mounting a new hard drive (sda1) to my existing filesystem
Why when I retrieve the list of partitions it only gives me one result?File system is not clean (The partition is misaligned by 1024 bytes)Unable to mount an LVM Hard-drive after upgradeDeleted Windows Partitions on drive now what do I do?Raid Issues Cannot Boot and Getting Superblock ErrorsCan't remove GPT table from hard driveDrive failure in Raid1. Can't replaceBoot linux on external hard disk - Send Grub RescueHow to configure existing raid after upgrading to 14.04 from 11Intel RAID5 array Shows < 50% space
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab
file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab
file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab
file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab
file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
partitioning mount
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
66.3k9134231
66.3k9134231
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22shank22
1112
1112
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab
:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmount
is entered in Terminal,fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f476924%2fmounting-a-new-hard-drive-sda1-to-my-existing-filesystem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab
:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmount
is entered in Terminal,fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab
:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmount
is entered in Terminal,fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab
:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab
:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
edited Jun 7 '14 at 10:23
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
SadiSadi
8,94544048
8,94544048
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmount
is entered in Terminal,fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmount
is entered in Terminal,fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The command
mount
is entered in Terminal, fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. via fstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
The command
mount
is entered in Terminal, fstab
entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. via fstab
entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f476924%2fmounting-a-new-hard-drive-sda1-to-my-existing-filesystem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you have a GUI?
– Dan
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57