Is it okay to delete the ~/.cache folder?Purpose of '~/.cache' directory and when is it safe to delete?Is it safe to remove files/folders from .cache?How do I determine the total size of a directory (folder) from the command line?How to recover deleted files?How can I access and backup ~/.gvfs and ~/.cache/dconf?How to auto clear cache on ubuntu 17.10?Netbeans cant run project anymore after taking the power from my computer?Can i just remove the ~/.cache directory?I have got garbage in home catalogDeleted .cache folder, how to recover?What is the real usage of my home folder?Ubuntu 12.04 Home folder showing fullHow to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Disable memory cache - real reasonClear .cache Tracker directory in Ubuntu?Why does my system use so much cache?Where is the Mozilla Firefox cache located?Remove or hide desktop folder in ~ (Xubuntu)Items on desktop all disappered, including my Home, from icon listDetermining the source of memory cache usage
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?
How does electrical safety system work on ISS?
How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?
Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?
Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?
Why do some congregations only make noise at certain occasions of Haman?
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?
Is it necessary to use pronouns with the verb "essere"?
It grows, but water kills it
Review your own paper in Mathematics
Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram
How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
Short story about a deaf man, who cuts people tongues
Delete multiple columns using awk or sed
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Is it okay to delete the ~/.cache folder?
Purpose of '~/.cache' directory and when is it safe to delete?Is it safe to remove files/folders from .cache?How do I determine the total size of a directory (folder) from the command line?How to recover deleted files?How can I access and backup ~/.gvfs and ~/.cache/dconf?How to auto clear cache on ubuntu 17.10?Netbeans cant run project anymore after taking the power from my computer?Can i just remove the ~/.cache directory?I have got garbage in home catalogDeleted .cache folder, how to recover?What is the real usage of my home folder?Ubuntu 12.04 Home folder showing fullHow to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Disable memory cache - real reasonClear .cache Tracker directory in Ubuntu?Why does my system use so much cache?Where is the Mozilla Firefox cache located?Remove or hide desktop folder in ~ (Xubuntu)Items on desktop all disappered, including my Home, from icon listDetermining the source of memory cache usage
When I use disk usage analyzer and scan my home folder, the .cache
folder in my home directory always shows up with a decent bit of things in it.
Would it be okay for me to delete the contents of this folder or would it damage something?
home-directory cache
add a comment |
When I use disk usage analyzer and scan my home folder, the .cache
folder in my home directory always shows up with a decent bit of things in it.
Would it be okay for me to delete the contents of this folder or would it damage something?
home-directory cache
3
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
2
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34
add a comment |
When I use disk usage analyzer and scan my home folder, the .cache
folder in my home directory always shows up with a decent bit of things in it.
Would it be okay for me to delete the contents of this folder or would it damage something?
home-directory cache
When I use disk usage analyzer and scan my home folder, the .cache
folder in my home directory always shows up with a decent bit of things in it.
Would it be okay for me to delete the contents of this folder or would it damage something?
home-directory cache
home-directory cache
edited 35 mins ago
Kevin Bowen
14.7k155970
14.7k155970
asked Feb 6 '12 at 23:53
AnerAner
726253
726253
3
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
2
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34
add a comment |
3
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
2
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34
3
3
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
2
2
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
To answer the question, IMO you can delete all of .cache
with no long term detrimental effects.
If your .cache
is growing large, it might be better to look at the contents and determine what application is making it large and re-configure a bad acting application (rather than simply deleting .cache
when it grows too large).
Another directory that can take up a lot of space (and/or save an embarrassing bit of evidence) is the .thumbs
directory. Many files in .thumbs
seem to be duplicates.
To clean (just take care with the -rf
flag and other directories ;)
rm -rf ~/.thumbs/*
When you are new to Ubuntu/Linux it is hard to know what you can and can not delete in your home directory. For the most part you can delete most anything in your home directory, programs or applications that require .cache
(or other dot files such as .local
) will re-create them.
Most of the time, at worst, you will lose custom configurations, but no real harm to the system.
I would not advise you start a habit of deleting things you do not understand in your home directory, back it up or use a test account. If in doubt, the safe thing would be to make a back up or move the file.
mv .cache .cache_backup
You can then restore from backup if needed.
Definitely do NOT start deleting things you do not understand outside of your home directory.
I get really nervous about any command that startsrm -rf
, so I'd recommend usinggvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead
– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on./dconf
(withdu -sh .
)? Already read this.
– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
add a comment |
It is generally safe to delete it. You might want to close all graphical applications (e.g. banshee, rhythmbox, vlc, software-center, ..) to prevent any confusion of the programs accessing the cache (where did my file go all of a sudden!?).
It can easily have a size of 100+ MB, so if you want to free up disk space, do it.
As already pointed out by BretD and Dylan McCall, the type of files are partial downloads, browser cache, media files like icons, etc, used to speed up future access to the same files.
Another thing to keep in mind: removing an application does not necessarily delete the relevant ~/.cache/removed_prog folder; in this case those files just take space and are not used. Those can definitely be deleted.
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
add a comment |
I just discovered that my backup disk was filling up with stuff from .cache (I guess applications are cleaning their own cache, but I don't delete backups so it's getting huge). So I'm excluding .cache from my backup list, but I noticed that .cache has stuff from TEN YEARS AGO, software I had forgotten I ever used!
This will delete everything in your .cache that was last accessed more than a year ago
find ~/.cache/ -type f -atime +365 -delete
If you're nervous about running it, this will show you what's going to be deleted:
find ~/.cache/ -depth -type f -atime +365
I'm using 'access time' for that, you could also try 'creation time' by using -ctime (although I've found many cache files which are years old but still accessed). Thanks to @n33rma for the edit suggestion.
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the-atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my/tmp/
folder; I use-atime +1
with no problems.
– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
add a comment |
I would recommend not deleting it. I am not a Linux expert (though I hope to be!) and don't know the specifics of the file system structure, but you can examine what exactly is in the folder by going into your home folder and hitting ctrl+h to show hidden folders. You can then go in the .cache folder and see what's in there.
Just from a quick peek on my system I know that banshee stores album art in the cache folder (don't know why exactly), chrome has data in the cache folder, a lot of programs keep logs in the .cache folder, and other stuff.
I am not sure if these files are all just there temporarily for speed increase purposes (like browser cache) or if this "cache" contains files for some other purpose (as the speed increase of browser cache is to counteract excessive use of bandwidth by re-accessing files on a server, whereas there should be no discernible difference in r/w times for a different file location on the hard disk).
I hope someone knows more about this than I do and can give you a better response.
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in.cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
add a comment |
I use Debian. Just open your home folder. Make it to show hidden files. You will see .cache in the folder. Open it and delete all the files you do not need. Sometime malware can lodge itself in the .cache and make your application run erratically. It will not do any harm to your Debian/Ubuntu system but may make it appear that something is really wrong with your system if you are a newbie. If you find something like that happening, you must stop all the applications, delete the contents of the .cache, and then restart your applications.
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
add a comment |
Don't delete unless you want a lousy browsing experience. Cache keeps info that remembers
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f102046%2fis-it-okay-to-delete-the-cache-folder%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To answer the question, IMO you can delete all of .cache
with no long term detrimental effects.
If your .cache
is growing large, it might be better to look at the contents and determine what application is making it large and re-configure a bad acting application (rather than simply deleting .cache
when it grows too large).
Another directory that can take up a lot of space (and/or save an embarrassing bit of evidence) is the .thumbs
directory. Many files in .thumbs
seem to be duplicates.
To clean (just take care with the -rf
flag and other directories ;)
rm -rf ~/.thumbs/*
When you are new to Ubuntu/Linux it is hard to know what you can and can not delete in your home directory. For the most part you can delete most anything in your home directory, programs or applications that require .cache
(or other dot files such as .local
) will re-create them.
Most of the time, at worst, you will lose custom configurations, but no real harm to the system.
I would not advise you start a habit of deleting things you do not understand in your home directory, back it up or use a test account. If in doubt, the safe thing would be to make a back up or move the file.
mv .cache .cache_backup
You can then restore from backup if needed.
Definitely do NOT start deleting things you do not understand outside of your home directory.
I get really nervous about any command that startsrm -rf
, so I'd recommend usinggvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead
– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on./dconf
(withdu -sh .
)? Already read this.
– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
add a comment |
To answer the question, IMO you can delete all of .cache
with no long term detrimental effects.
If your .cache
is growing large, it might be better to look at the contents and determine what application is making it large and re-configure a bad acting application (rather than simply deleting .cache
when it grows too large).
Another directory that can take up a lot of space (and/or save an embarrassing bit of evidence) is the .thumbs
directory. Many files in .thumbs
seem to be duplicates.
To clean (just take care with the -rf
flag and other directories ;)
rm -rf ~/.thumbs/*
When you are new to Ubuntu/Linux it is hard to know what you can and can not delete in your home directory. For the most part you can delete most anything in your home directory, programs or applications that require .cache
(or other dot files such as .local
) will re-create them.
Most of the time, at worst, you will lose custom configurations, but no real harm to the system.
I would not advise you start a habit of deleting things you do not understand in your home directory, back it up or use a test account. If in doubt, the safe thing would be to make a back up or move the file.
mv .cache .cache_backup
You can then restore from backup if needed.
Definitely do NOT start deleting things you do not understand outside of your home directory.
I get really nervous about any command that startsrm -rf
, so I'd recommend usinggvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead
– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on./dconf
(withdu -sh .
)? Already read this.
– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
add a comment |
To answer the question, IMO you can delete all of .cache
with no long term detrimental effects.
If your .cache
is growing large, it might be better to look at the contents and determine what application is making it large and re-configure a bad acting application (rather than simply deleting .cache
when it grows too large).
Another directory that can take up a lot of space (and/or save an embarrassing bit of evidence) is the .thumbs
directory. Many files in .thumbs
seem to be duplicates.
To clean (just take care with the -rf
flag and other directories ;)
rm -rf ~/.thumbs/*
When you are new to Ubuntu/Linux it is hard to know what you can and can not delete in your home directory. For the most part you can delete most anything in your home directory, programs or applications that require .cache
(or other dot files such as .local
) will re-create them.
Most of the time, at worst, you will lose custom configurations, but no real harm to the system.
I would not advise you start a habit of deleting things you do not understand in your home directory, back it up or use a test account. If in doubt, the safe thing would be to make a back up or move the file.
mv .cache .cache_backup
You can then restore from backup if needed.
Definitely do NOT start deleting things you do not understand outside of your home directory.
To answer the question, IMO you can delete all of .cache
with no long term detrimental effects.
If your .cache
is growing large, it might be better to look at the contents and determine what application is making it large and re-configure a bad acting application (rather than simply deleting .cache
when it grows too large).
Another directory that can take up a lot of space (and/or save an embarrassing bit of evidence) is the .thumbs
directory. Many files in .thumbs
seem to be duplicates.
To clean (just take care with the -rf
flag and other directories ;)
rm -rf ~/.thumbs/*
When you are new to Ubuntu/Linux it is hard to know what you can and can not delete in your home directory. For the most part you can delete most anything in your home directory, programs or applications that require .cache
(or other dot files such as .local
) will re-create them.
Most of the time, at worst, you will lose custom configurations, but no real harm to the system.
I would not advise you start a habit of deleting things you do not understand in your home directory, back it up or use a test account. If in doubt, the safe thing would be to make a back up or move the file.
mv .cache .cache_backup
You can then restore from backup if needed.
Definitely do NOT start deleting things you do not understand outside of your home directory.
edited Sep 28 '16 at 18:49
edwinksl
17.3k125487
17.3k125487
answered Sep 28 '12 at 21:20
PantherPanther
79.8k14159259
79.8k14159259
I get really nervous about any command that startsrm -rf
, so I'd recommend usinggvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead
– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on./dconf
(withdu -sh .
)? Already read this.
– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
add a comment |
I get really nervous about any command that startsrm -rf
, so I'd recommend usinggvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead
– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on./dconf
(withdu -sh .
)? Already read this.
– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
I get really nervous about any command that starts
rm -rf
, so I'd recommend using gvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I get really nervous about any command that starts
rm -rf
, so I'd recommend using gvfs-trash ~/.thumbs
instead– wjandrea
Aug 25 '17 at 21:44
I wonder why I get permission denied on
./dconf
(with du -sh .
)? Already read this.– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
I wonder why I get permission denied on
./dconf
(with du -sh .
)? Already read this.– Pablo Bianchi
Sep 27 '17 at 5:13
add a comment |
It is generally safe to delete it. You might want to close all graphical applications (e.g. banshee, rhythmbox, vlc, software-center, ..) to prevent any confusion of the programs accessing the cache (where did my file go all of a sudden!?).
It can easily have a size of 100+ MB, so if you want to free up disk space, do it.
As already pointed out by BretD and Dylan McCall, the type of files are partial downloads, browser cache, media files like icons, etc, used to speed up future access to the same files.
Another thing to keep in mind: removing an application does not necessarily delete the relevant ~/.cache/removed_prog folder; in this case those files just take space and are not used. Those can definitely be deleted.
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
add a comment |
It is generally safe to delete it. You might want to close all graphical applications (e.g. banshee, rhythmbox, vlc, software-center, ..) to prevent any confusion of the programs accessing the cache (where did my file go all of a sudden!?).
It can easily have a size of 100+ MB, so if you want to free up disk space, do it.
As already pointed out by BretD and Dylan McCall, the type of files are partial downloads, browser cache, media files like icons, etc, used to speed up future access to the same files.
Another thing to keep in mind: removing an application does not necessarily delete the relevant ~/.cache/removed_prog folder; in this case those files just take space and are not used. Those can definitely be deleted.
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
add a comment |
It is generally safe to delete it. You might want to close all graphical applications (e.g. banshee, rhythmbox, vlc, software-center, ..) to prevent any confusion of the programs accessing the cache (where did my file go all of a sudden!?).
It can easily have a size of 100+ MB, so if you want to free up disk space, do it.
As already pointed out by BretD and Dylan McCall, the type of files are partial downloads, browser cache, media files like icons, etc, used to speed up future access to the same files.
Another thing to keep in mind: removing an application does not necessarily delete the relevant ~/.cache/removed_prog folder; in this case those files just take space and are not used. Those can definitely be deleted.
It is generally safe to delete it. You might want to close all graphical applications (e.g. banshee, rhythmbox, vlc, software-center, ..) to prevent any confusion of the programs accessing the cache (where did my file go all of a sudden!?).
It can easily have a size of 100+ MB, so if you want to free up disk space, do it.
As already pointed out by BretD and Dylan McCall, the type of files are partial downloads, browser cache, media files like icons, etc, used to speed up future access to the same files.
Another thing to keep in mind: removing an application does not necessarily delete the relevant ~/.cache/removed_prog folder; in this case those files just take space and are not used. Those can definitely be deleted.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
1
answered Sep 28 '12 at 20:54
roschrosch
5,45411323
5,45411323
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
add a comment |
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
If you're going to wipe ~/.cache, best to wipe it all at once (so you don't confuse any application with an inconsistent/partial state), then restart immediately after (just in case some application that uses files in ~/.cache is still running in the background).
– thomasrutter
Feb 11 '16 at 3:57
add a comment |
I just discovered that my backup disk was filling up with stuff from .cache (I guess applications are cleaning their own cache, but I don't delete backups so it's getting huge). So I'm excluding .cache from my backup list, but I noticed that .cache has stuff from TEN YEARS AGO, software I had forgotten I ever used!
This will delete everything in your .cache that was last accessed more than a year ago
find ~/.cache/ -type f -atime +365 -delete
If you're nervous about running it, this will show you what's going to be deleted:
find ~/.cache/ -depth -type f -atime +365
I'm using 'access time' for that, you could also try 'creation time' by using -ctime (although I've found many cache files which are years old but still accessed). Thanks to @n33rma for the edit suggestion.
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the-atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my/tmp/
folder; I use-atime +1
with no problems.
– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
add a comment |
I just discovered that my backup disk was filling up with stuff from .cache (I guess applications are cleaning their own cache, but I don't delete backups so it's getting huge). So I'm excluding .cache from my backup list, but I noticed that .cache has stuff from TEN YEARS AGO, software I had forgotten I ever used!
This will delete everything in your .cache that was last accessed more than a year ago
find ~/.cache/ -type f -atime +365 -delete
If you're nervous about running it, this will show you what's going to be deleted:
find ~/.cache/ -depth -type f -atime +365
I'm using 'access time' for that, you could also try 'creation time' by using -ctime (although I've found many cache files which are years old but still accessed). Thanks to @n33rma for the edit suggestion.
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the-atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my/tmp/
folder; I use-atime +1
with no problems.
– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
add a comment |
I just discovered that my backup disk was filling up with stuff from .cache (I guess applications are cleaning their own cache, but I don't delete backups so it's getting huge). So I'm excluding .cache from my backup list, but I noticed that .cache has stuff from TEN YEARS AGO, software I had forgotten I ever used!
This will delete everything in your .cache that was last accessed more than a year ago
find ~/.cache/ -type f -atime +365 -delete
If you're nervous about running it, this will show you what's going to be deleted:
find ~/.cache/ -depth -type f -atime +365
I'm using 'access time' for that, you could also try 'creation time' by using -ctime (although I've found many cache files which are years old but still accessed). Thanks to @n33rma for the edit suggestion.
I just discovered that my backup disk was filling up with stuff from .cache (I guess applications are cleaning their own cache, but I don't delete backups so it's getting huge). So I'm excluding .cache from my backup list, but I noticed that .cache has stuff from TEN YEARS AGO, software I had forgotten I ever used!
This will delete everything in your .cache that was last accessed more than a year ago
find ~/.cache/ -type f -atime +365 -delete
If you're nervous about running it, this will show you what's going to be deleted:
find ~/.cache/ -depth -type f -atime +365
I'm using 'access time' for that, you could also try 'creation time' by using -ctime (although I've found many cache files which are years old but still accessed). Thanks to @n33rma for the edit suggestion.
edited Apr 19 '17 at 0:48
answered Feb 11 '16 at 3:51
andrew lorienandrew lorien
445410
445410
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the-atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my/tmp/
folder; I use-atime +1
with no problems.
– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
add a comment |
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the-atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my/tmp/
folder; I use-atime +1
with no problems.
– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
1
1
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted
~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the -atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my /tmp/
folder; I use -atime +1
with no problems.– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
Exactly my issue, too! My daily backups were consistently ~1.7GB. Now that I deleted
~/.cache
, they're only ~0.1 GB! Good suggestion re: the -atime
flag, too. What I do is put a similar find command in my crontab, also for my /tmp/
folder; I use -atime +1
with no problems.– Geremia
Aug 25 '16 at 14:44
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
issue : du ~/.cache | sort -n to see sort by dir size
– Scott Stensland
Oct 7 '16 at 16:33
add a comment |
I would recommend not deleting it. I am not a Linux expert (though I hope to be!) and don't know the specifics of the file system structure, but you can examine what exactly is in the folder by going into your home folder and hitting ctrl+h to show hidden folders. You can then go in the .cache folder and see what's in there.
Just from a quick peek on my system I know that banshee stores album art in the cache folder (don't know why exactly), chrome has data in the cache folder, a lot of programs keep logs in the .cache folder, and other stuff.
I am not sure if these files are all just there temporarily for speed increase purposes (like browser cache) or if this "cache" contains files for some other purpose (as the speed increase of browser cache is to counteract excessive use of bandwidth by re-accessing files on a server, whereas there should be no discernible difference in r/w times for a different file location on the hard disk).
I hope someone knows more about this than I do and can give you a better response.
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in.cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
add a comment |
I would recommend not deleting it. I am not a Linux expert (though I hope to be!) and don't know the specifics of the file system structure, but you can examine what exactly is in the folder by going into your home folder and hitting ctrl+h to show hidden folders. You can then go in the .cache folder and see what's in there.
Just from a quick peek on my system I know that banshee stores album art in the cache folder (don't know why exactly), chrome has data in the cache folder, a lot of programs keep logs in the .cache folder, and other stuff.
I am not sure if these files are all just there temporarily for speed increase purposes (like browser cache) or if this "cache" contains files for some other purpose (as the speed increase of browser cache is to counteract excessive use of bandwidth by re-accessing files on a server, whereas there should be no discernible difference in r/w times for a different file location on the hard disk).
I hope someone knows more about this than I do and can give you a better response.
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in.cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
add a comment |
I would recommend not deleting it. I am not a Linux expert (though I hope to be!) and don't know the specifics of the file system structure, but you can examine what exactly is in the folder by going into your home folder and hitting ctrl+h to show hidden folders. You can then go in the .cache folder and see what's in there.
Just from a quick peek on my system I know that banshee stores album art in the cache folder (don't know why exactly), chrome has data in the cache folder, a lot of programs keep logs in the .cache folder, and other stuff.
I am not sure if these files are all just there temporarily for speed increase purposes (like browser cache) or if this "cache" contains files for some other purpose (as the speed increase of browser cache is to counteract excessive use of bandwidth by re-accessing files on a server, whereas there should be no discernible difference in r/w times for a different file location on the hard disk).
I hope someone knows more about this than I do and can give you a better response.
I would recommend not deleting it. I am not a Linux expert (though I hope to be!) and don't know the specifics of the file system structure, but you can examine what exactly is in the folder by going into your home folder and hitting ctrl+h to show hidden folders. You can then go in the .cache folder and see what's in there.
Just from a quick peek on my system I know that banshee stores album art in the cache folder (don't know why exactly), chrome has data in the cache folder, a lot of programs keep logs in the .cache folder, and other stuff.
I am not sure if these files are all just there temporarily for speed increase purposes (like browser cache) or if this "cache" contains files for some other purpose (as the speed increase of browser cache is to counteract excessive use of bandwidth by re-accessing files on a server, whereas there should be no discernible difference in r/w times for a different file location on the hard disk).
I hope someone knows more about this than I do and can give you a better response.
answered Feb 7 '12 at 0:18
BretDBretD
6431611
6431611
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in.cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
add a comment |
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in.cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.
– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete
.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
Yes, I agree that it isn't a good idea to delete
.cache
. If possible, use the program that creates the relevant folder. Deleting Chrome's cache, for example, should preferably be done via Chrome. If a program doesn't offer a visible means of managing its cache, it may be safer to leave it alone unless one really knows.– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:13
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:
du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in .cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
One more thing you could consider if you don't dislike using the terminal and typing commands is this:
du ~/.cache > cachefolders_size
. What it does is to give you a list with sizes of each folder in .cache
. You can paste the information from the file generated into a spreadsheet and then sort it to your taste. I read about it here.– user25656
Feb 7 '12 at 5:34
32
32
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
The idea of .cache is that it is deletable (see standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html). Applications shouldn't depend on it, and I really have never noticed an application doing it wrong. Banshee is indeed a funny case, but it's a great example: BretD is right that you probably won't want to delete all your cache, because it is generally there for a good reason. It takes a long time for Banshee to get cover art. It can do it again, but it will look ugly in the interim.
– Dylan McCall
Feb 7 '12 at 6:41
1
1
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
@vasa1 or you can use a GUI-based disk usage analyzer. I think Baobab, should be available on Ubuntu (I use it in Debian)
– Alois Mahdal
Nov 25 '13 at 2:33
1
1
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
@DylanMcCall That link to the standard makes your comment more useful than all the other answers. If you made that comment an answer, I'd upvote it.
– Parthian Shot
Apr 21 '15 at 5:41
add a comment |
I use Debian. Just open your home folder. Make it to show hidden files. You will see .cache in the folder. Open it and delete all the files you do not need. Sometime malware can lodge itself in the .cache and make your application run erratically. It will not do any harm to your Debian/Ubuntu system but may make it appear that something is really wrong with your system if you are a newbie. If you find something like that happening, you must stop all the applications, delete the contents of the .cache, and then restart your applications.
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
add a comment |
I use Debian. Just open your home folder. Make it to show hidden files. You will see .cache in the folder. Open it and delete all the files you do not need. Sometime malware can lodge itself in the .cache and make your application run erratically. It will not do any harm to your Debian/Ubuntu system but may make it appear that something is really wrong with your system if you are a newbie. If you find something like that happening, you must stop all the applications, delete the contents of the .cache, and then restart your applications.
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
add a comment |
I use Debian. Just open your home folder. Make it to show hidden files. You will see .cache in the folder. Open it and delete all the files you do not need. Sometime malware can lodge itself in the .cache and make your application run erratically. It will not do any harm to your Debian/Ubuntu system but may make it appear that something is really wrong with your system if you are a newbie. If you find something like that happening, you must stop all the applications, delete the contents of the .cache, and then restart your applications.
I use Debian. Just open your home folder. Make it to show hidden files. You will see .cache in the folder. Open it and delete all the files you do not need. Sometime malware can lodge itself in the .cache and make your application run erratically. It will not do any harm to your Debian/Ubuntu system but may make it appear that something is really wrong with your system if you are a newbie. If you find something like that happening, you must stop all the applications, delete the contents of the .cache, and then restart your applications.
answered Dec 30 '16 at 5:51
Goldin R. BennetGoldin R. Bennet
1
1
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
add a comment |
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
1
1
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
Can you make this answer more authentic ?
– rɑːdʒɑ
Dec 30 '16 at 6:08
add a comment |
Don't delete unless you want a lousy browsing experience. Cache keeps info that remembers
New contributor
add a comment |
Don't delete unless you want a lousy browsing experience. Cache keeps info that remembers
New contributor
add a comment |
Don't delete unless you want a lousy browsing experience. Cache keeps info that remembers
New contributor
Don't delete unless you want a lousy browsing experience. Cache keeps info that remembers
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Rudi SimonRudi Simon
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f102046%2fis-it-okay-to-delete-the-cache-folder%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
My .cache was 11G
– cmcginty
Aug 17 '13 at 0:16
2
Possible cross site duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/366771/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Mar 16 '14 at 21:34