Ttgjyuk

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

Where did Heinlein say "Once you get to Earth orbit, you're halfway to anywhere in the Solar System"?

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Character escape sequences for ">"

Closed-form expression for certain product

Finding NDSolve method details

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?

Non-trope happy ending?

Start making guitar arrangements

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Creature in Shazam mid-credits scene?

Create all possible words using a set or letters

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Does the expansion of the universe explain why the universe doesn't collapse?

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?

Approximating irrational number to rational number

Question about the proof of Second Isomorphism Theorem

Isomorphism theorem and proving $f:Gto G'$ onto, $K'triangleleft G'Rightarrow G/f^-1(K')cong G'/K'$Interpretation of Second isomorphism theoremQuestion about second Isomorphism TheoremNeed isomorphism theorem intuitionWhy $phi(H) cong H/ kerphi$ in the Second Isomorphism Theorem?Intuition behind the first isomorphism theoremIntuition about the first isomorphism theoremIntuition about the second isomorphism theoremFundamental Isomorphism TheoremFinding the kernel of $phi$ of applying the First Isomorphism Theorem

4

$begingroup$

The Second Isomorphism Theorem:
Let $H$ be a subgroup of a group $G$ and $N$ a normal subgroup of $G$. Then
$$H/(Hcap N)cong(HN)/N$$

There is the proof of Abstract Algebra Thomas by W. Judson:

Define a map $phi$ from $H$ to $HN/N$ by $Hmapsto hN$. The map $phi$ is onto, since any coset $hnN=hN$ is the image of $h$ in $H$. We also know that $phi$ is a homomorphism because
$$phi(hh')=hh'N=hNh'N=phi(h)phi(h')$$
By the First Isomorphism Theorem, the image of $phi$ is isomorphic to $H/kerphi$, that is
$$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/kerphi$$
Since
$$kerphi=hin H:hin N=Hcap N$$
$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/Hcap N$

My question:

Is it necessary to prove that the map $phi$ is onto? Can we only prove that $phi$ is well defined and the image of $phi$ is a subset of $HN/N$? And then we can use the First Isomorphism Theorem and continue the proof.

Thank you.

abstract-algebra group-theory group-isomorphism group-homomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

4

$begingroup$

The Second Isomorphism Theorem:
Let $H$ be a subgroup of a group $G$ and $N$ a normal subgroup of $G$. Then
$$H/(Hcap N)cong(HN)/N$$

There is the proof of Abstract Algebra Thomas by W. Judson:

Define a map $phi$ from $H$ to $HN/N$ by $Hmapsto hN$. The map $phi$ is onto, since any coset $hnN=hN$ is the image of $h$ in $H$. We also know that $phi$ is a homomorphism because
$$phi(hh')=hh'N=hNh'N=phi(h)phi(h')$$
By the First Isomorphism Theorem, the image of $phi$ is isomorphic to $H/kerphi$, that is
$$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/kerphi$$
Since
$$kerphi=hin H:hin N=Hcap N$$
$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/Hcap N$

My question:

Is it necessary to prove that the map $phi$ is onto? Can we only prove that $phi$ is well defined and the image of $phi$ is a subset of $HN/N$? And then we can use the First Isomorphism Theorem and continue the proof.

Thank you.

abstract-algebra group-theory group-isomorphism group-homomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The Second Isomorphism Theorem:
Let $H$ be a subgroup of a group $G$ and $N$ a normal subgroup of $G$. Then
$$H/(Hcap N)cong(HN)/N$$

There is the proof of Abstract Algebra Thomas by W. Judson:

Define a map $phi$ from $H$ to $HN/N$ by $Hmapsto hN$. The map $phi$ is onto, since any coset $hnN=hN$ is the image of $h$ in $H$. We also know that $phi$ is a homomorphism because
$$phi(hh')=hh'N=hNh'N=phi(h)phi(h')$$
By the First Isomorphism Theorem, the image of $phi$ is isomorphic to $H/kerphi$, that is
$$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/kerphi$$
Since
$$kerphi=hin H:hin N=Hcap N$$
$HN/N=phi(H)cong H/Hcap N$

My question:

Is it necessary to prove that the map $phi$ is onto? Can we only prove that $phi$ is well defined and the image of $phi$ is a subset of $HN/N$? And then we can use the First Isomorphism Theorem and continue the proof.

Thank you.

abstract-algebra group-theory group-isomorphism group-homomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

edited 4 hours ago

Andrews

1,2761421

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

New contributor

NiaBie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

NiaBieNiaBie

232

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

$begingroup$

The First Isomorphism Theorem states that if $varphi: G to G'$, then $mathrmim(varphi) cong G/mathrmker(varphi)$. If we do not know that your $phi$ is surjective, then the First Isomorphism Theorem only shows us that $H/H cap N cong mathrmim(phi) subseteq HN/N$, which does not finish the job.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

NiaBie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160013%2fquestion-about-the-proof-of-second-isomorphism-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

$begingroup$

The First Isomorphism Theorem states that if $varphi: G to G'$, then $mathrmim(varphi) cong G/mathrmker(varphi)$. If we do not know that your $phi$ is surjective, then the First Isomorphism Theorem only shows us that $H/H cap N cong mathrmim(phi) subseteq HN/N$, which does not finish the job.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

The First Isomorphism Theorem states that if $varphi: G to G'$, then $mathrmim(varphi) cong G/mathrmker(varphi)$. If we do not know that your $phi$ is surjective, then the First Isomorphism Theorem only shows us that $H/H cap N cong mathrmim(phi) subseteq HN/N$, which does not finish the job.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The First Isomorphism Theorem states that if $varphi: G to G'$, then $mathrmim(varphi) cong G/mathrmker(varphi)$. If we do not know that your $phi$ is surjective, then the First Isomorphism Theorem only shows us that $H/H cap N cong mathrmim(phi) subseteq HN/N$, which does not finish the job.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028

answered 4 hours ago

Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

2,7621028