is this legal and f i dont come up with extra money is the deal offContribute extra to companies 401k with the intention of withdrawing it for house down payment?Finding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?
Should I outline or discovery write my stories?
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?
Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?
2.8 Why are collections grayed out? How can I open them?
Problem with TransformedDistribution
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?
What is this called? Old film camera viewer?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
New brakes for 90s road bike
Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file
Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?
Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?
How could a planet have erratic days?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
Creepy dinosaur pc game identification
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?
What was the exact wording from Ivanhoe of this advice on how to free yourself from slavery?
C++ debug/print custom type with GDB : the case of nlohmann json library
Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources
is this legal and f i dont come up with extra money is the deal off
Contribute extra to companies 401k with the intention of withdrawing it for house down payment?Finding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised
I am purchasing a house apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. his realtor is now asking me if i can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?
house
New contributor
add a comment |
I am purchasing a house apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. his realtor is now asking me if i can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?
house
New contributor
1
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago
add a comment |
I am purchasing a house apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. his realtor is now asking me if i can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?
house
New contributor
I am purchasing a house apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. his realtor is now asking me if i can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?
house
house
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
user83725user83725
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
1
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago
add a comment |
1
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago
1
1
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.
If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.
The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.
So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user83725 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106884%2fis-this-legal-and-f-i-dont-come-up-with-extra-money-is-the-deal-off%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.
If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.
The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.
So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
add a comment |
It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.
If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.
The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.
So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
add a comment |
It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.
If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.
The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.
So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.
It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.
If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.
The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.
So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.
answered 3 hours ago
AganjuAganju
21.9k43577
21.9k43577
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
add a comment |
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.
– DJClayworth
2 hours ago
1
1
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.
– chepner
1 hour ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.
– corsiKa
6 mins ago
add a comment |
user83725 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user83725 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user83725 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user83725 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106884%2fis-this-legal-and-f-i-dont-come-up-with-extra-money-is-the-deal-off%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.
– CQM
3 hours ago
In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?
– Lawrence
21 mins ago
Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.
– corsiKa
5 mins ago
So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?
– Tas
3 mins ago